Re: [nemo] New draft submitted: draft-tsukada-nemo-mr-cooperation-analysis-00.txt

[Thierry Ernst <[e-mail]>]

Dear all,

Regarding issues developped in 
Analysis of Multihoming in Network Mobility Support
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nemo-multihoming-issues-04.txt

I will like to highlight the need for MR cooperation (the issues are
further developped in our draft
Analysis of Multiple Mobile Routers Cooperation
http://www.nautilus6.org/doc/drafts/draft-tsukada-nemo-mr-cooperation-analysis-00.txt

I don't have a personal conclusion whether we could rely on existing or
generic but to be developped mechanisms for MR cooperation OR we should
take the specificities of bi-directional tunneling into account (HoA,
CoA, etc). So, this draft has been written with the objective of
advancing the thinking on this. 

We would appreciate to receive comments on the draft, but more
importantly, as chair, I would appreciate if we could discuss the need
to address this issue, as pointed in
as issue 4.4
http://www.mobilenetworks.org/nemo/drafts/draft-ietf-nemo-multihoming-issues-04.html#sec:problem.mrsync
in draft-ietf-nemo-multihoming-issues-04.txt

Thanks,
Thierry.


On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:16:17 +0900
Manabu Tsukada <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> We have submitted a new draft about MRs cooperation analysis.
> The aim of this document is to investigate issues and requirements
> for MRs cooperation to get benefits of multihoming.
> 
> Any feedback is of course welcome.
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.nautilus6.org/doc/drafts/draft-tsukada-nemo-mr-cooperation-analysis-00.txt
> 
> 	Title		: Analysis of Multiple Mobile Routers Cooperation
> 	Author(s)	: M. Tsukada, R. Kuntz and T. Ernst
> 	Filename	: draft-tsukada-nemo-mr-cooperation-analysis-00.txt
> 	Pages		: 19
> 	Date		: 2005-10-17
>    Abstract:
>    This document is an analysis of multiple Mobile Routers Cooperation
>    in the context of network mobility support (NEMO) in IPv6.  Our
>    objective is to identify when cooperation between MRs is needed and
>    what information must be exchanged.