Re: [nemo] Question on TD
Thierry Ernst <ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Tue, 31 August 2004 04:07 UTC
Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA29771 for <nemo-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:07:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C1zsA-0000mj-Bh; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:03:54 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C1zmP-00082a-5V for nemo@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:57:57 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA29051 for <nemo@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:57:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from shonan.sfc.wide.ad.jp ([203.178.142.130]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C1zoI-00008x-0s for nemo@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:59:55 -0400
Received: from galibier.nautilus6.org (unknown [2001:200:0:8400:206:5bff:fe73:439f]) by shonan.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603555D0BB for <nemo@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:57:24 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:57:08 +0900
From: Thierry Ernst <ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: nemo@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nemo] Question on TD
Message-Id: <20040831125708.6a92c1ce.ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <412F2F03.4040508@motorola.com>
References: <412F2F03.4040508@motorola.com>
Organization: Keio University
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi, > "When the NEMO where the MN is connected to is multihomed, the MN may > have the choice between several AR to be its default router" > > What does this mean? I concur, 'what does it mean' ? If a MN attaches to the NEMO (and thus becomes a VMN from our terminology), its default router is the MR (or one of the MR if the NEMO is multihomed (cases [n,*,1] from http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nemo-multihoming-issues-00.txt) The AR is the default router of the MR. > If MNis connected to a NEMO then it is connected, so it has no choice > between several AR's. MN has a default router already. It's that > NEMO's TLMR that has choice, no? > > Or maybe it is meant that MN may use one of the two MR's (TLMR's) as its > default route? in which case the default router of the VMN would still be one of the root-MRs (what some people call TLMR - note that the decision at IETF60 is to remove this term and solely use root-MR). Thierry
- [nemo] Question on TD Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] Question on TD Thierry Ernst
- RE: [nemo] Question on TD Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [nemo] Question on TD Masafumi Watari
- RE: [nemo] Question on TD Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [nemo] Question on TD Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] Question on TD Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] Question on TD Nicolas Montavont