Re: [nemo] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-nemo-terminology

[Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Hi Thierry,

Thierry Ernst wrote:
>>>What I didn't like in the term "MNP" is the wording "mobile network"
>>>(many people are still confused with cellular networks for mobile 
>>>devices),
>>
>>Probably use "moving network" instead of "mobile network"?
> 
>>MNP: moving network prefix?
> 
> This term cannot be changed. (see RFC 3753)

Ok.

>>>VMN: assigned to a home link that doesn't belong to the mobile
>>>network
>>
>>VMN: its HA is different than MR's and is not on any link of that MR.
> 
> Not necessarily.  The VMN and the MR can be on the same home link, and
> in this case the VMN doesn't belong to the MR-administered area. In any
> case, as long as the MNN does need to obtain a CoA, it is considered a
> VMN.

Ok.

>>draft nit:
>>
>>>Its address is located within an MNP.
>>
>>"Derived from the MNP"?
> 
> 
> Do you propose a new definition ? If yes, can you state is fully, and
> can we get people to agree / disagree ? Before you do this, is this
> needed, I mean please think to yourself how much it does improve the
> definition (if it does).

It's not a new definition, it's a draft nit.  Within the draft the
phrase "Its address is located within an MNP" appears.  It could be
re-phrased into "Its address is derived from the...".

Alex