Re: re:[nemo] Request for your comments on a new RO draft
"Jaehoon Jeong" <paul@etri.re.kr> Wed, 18 June 2003 14:49 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA10655 for <nemo-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:49:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19SdeU-00036k-H6; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:11:06 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19SdMy-0001nF-Pu for nemo@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:53:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA07046 for <nemo@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:52:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19SdKh-0004qp-00 for nemo@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:50:39 -0400
Received: from dns1.nal.motlabs.com ([195.212.111.242] helo=jessica.nal.motlabs.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19SdKc-0004qm-00 for nemo@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:50:39 -0400
Received: from pec.etri.re.kr (pec.etri.re.kr [129.254.114.50]) by jessica.nal.motlabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5IDqndJ001465 for <nemo@nal.motlabs.com>; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:52:50 +0200
Received: from paulnb (paul3.etri.re.kr [129.254.112.196]) by pec.etri.re.kr (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id h5IE5Z705281; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 23:05:35 +0900 (KST)
Message-ID: <001601c335a0$badf1f10$c470fe81@etri.re.kr>
From: Jaehoon Jeong <paul@etri.re.kr>
To: Wanrong Yu <wlyu@nudt.edu.cn>
Cc: NEMO WG <nemo@nal.motlabs.com>, autonet <autonet@ipv6.or.kr>
References: <20030618083417.64F7A5B15B@ds20.nudt.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: re:[nemo] Request for your comments on a new RO draft
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:51:34 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Sender: nemo-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: nemo-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by ietf.org id KAA10655
----- Original Message ----- From: "Wanrong Yu" <wlyu@nudt.edu.cn> To: <paul@etri.re.kr> Cc: <nemo@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:34 PM Subject: re:[nemo] Request for your comments on a new RO draft > > Hi Jaehoon, > > I have read your draft. > > If the mobile node in the NEMO form a new CoA with the > network prefix of access network,the packet send by the > mobile nodes will use the new CoA as the source > address,my question is how could the packet by pass the > ingress filtering of MR? So the mechanism of MR's > ingress filtering needs some adaption. > Because my scheme uses multi-link subnet, there happens no ingress filtering. Refer to "Multi-link Subnet Support in IPv6" draft for detailed mechanism. http://www.amaranthnetworks.com/ietf/drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-multilink-subnets-00.txt > Also, if the NEMO is multihomed and has different ARs > with different network prefixs(AR_Ps), does there > anything new to be considered? I am considering multi-homing now. Maybe, I think, something will be added, such as the selection of Acess Network prefixes. > If something wrong, please correct me. > Thanks. > > Wanrong Yu > Thanks for your suggestion. /Jaehoon
- [nemo] re:[nemo] Request for your comments on a n… Wanrong Yu
- Re: re:[nemo] Request for your comments on a new … Jaehoon Jeong