Re: [nemo] CFP NEMO WG slot

Thierry Ernst <ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Thu, 03 March 2005 13:07 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA20687 for <nemo-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:07:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D6q0j-0008HK-2f; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:05:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D6q0g-0008Gk-LU for nemo@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:04:59 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA20348 for <nemo@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:04:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp ([203.178.142.146]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D6q1y-0008Iu-9l for nemo@ietf.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:06:23 -0500
Received: from iseran.local (jules.nautilus6.org [203.178.138.2]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196EC4C6B7; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:04:44 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 22:09:00 +0900
From: Thierry Ernst <ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: chan <cwng@psl.com.sg>, nemo <nemo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nemo] CFP NEMO WG slot
Message-Id: <20050303220900.0995a841.ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <1109665746.9286.72.camel@bach.psl.com.sg>
References: <20050223215358.20cab146.ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp> <1109665746.9286.72.camel@bach.psl.com.sg>
Organization: Keio University
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear all,

> On 05/03/01 ChanWah wrote:
> Lastly, I presume the chairs will be handling the issue of WG
> RO-Analsys/Problem-Statement draft.  Let me know if I presume wrongly.

Yes. And I have asked Zhao to recap the current status of the NEMO RO
discussion since last IETF, so I hope you guys are able to sync
yourselves into a fair description of where we all are now.

Let me remind that we at least have the following 4 drafts on the table:

NEMO Route Optimization Problem Statement and Analysis
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhao-nemo-ro-ps-01.txt

Route Optimization with Nested Correspondent Nodes
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-watari-nemo-nested-cn-01.txt

Taxonomy of Route Optimization models in the Nemo Context
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-thubert-nemo-ro-taxonomy-04.txt

NEMO Route Optimisation Problem Statement
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-clausen-nemo-ro-problem-statement-00.txt


Thierry.