RE: [nemo] a special discussion session for threat analysis and security requirements

"marcelo bagnulo" <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es> Tue, 02 March 2004 05:58 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA04429 for <nemo-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:58:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ay2un-0002og-9J; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 00:58:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ay2uF-0002hp-BU for nemo@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 00:57:27 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA04366 for <nemo@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:57:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ay2uC-0001eS-00 for nemo@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 00:57:24 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ay2tL-0001YN-00 for nemo@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 00:56:32 -0500
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es ([163.117.136.121]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ay2su-0001Qb-00 for nemo@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 00:56:04 -0500
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BAA10AC6; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:55:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lolo (vpn-252-215.uc3m.es [163.117.252.215]) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with SMTP id BE85A10AD4; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:55:32 +0100 (CET)
Reply-To: mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es
From: marcelo bagnulo <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>
To: "S. Felix Wu" <wu@cs.ucdavis.edu>, IETF NEMO WG <nemo@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [nemo] a special discussion session for threat analysis and security requirements
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:53:30 +0900
Message-ID: <LIEEJBCNFDJHFFKJJDPACEIPDMAA.mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <40441083.6020908@cs.ucdavis.edu>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: nemo-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: nemo-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Felix,

> BTW, I found one document related to threat analysis for multi-
> homing:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ohta-multi6-threats-00.txt

I don't know how usefull you'll find this draft... it is mainly focused in
transport layer solutions (as its tittle states ;-) "Threats Relating to
Transport Layer Protocols Handling Multiple Addresses"

Probably, if you want to have a more broader view of multihoming threats, i
would recommend reading

Erik Nordmark, Tony Li, "Threats relating to IPv6 multihoming solutions"

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nordmark-multi6-threats-00.txt

Another important reading for this, IMHO, would be

P. Nikander et al., "Mobile IP version 6 Route Optimization Security Design
Background"

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nikander-mobileip-v6-ro-sec-02.txt


regards, marcelo

>
> -Felix
>
>
> S. Felix Wu wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems to me that we have many folks are interested in working on
> > security/threat related issues under NEMO, while, as TJ concluded
> > today, we still need a good external review for security issues.
> >
> > In order for us to work together more effectively as a team and
> > to consolidate different efforts, I proposed to TJ that maybe we
> > should have a special meeting this week in Seoul to discuss about
> > security issue. This special discussion will be open to any one
> > who is interested in the security issue under NEMO.
> >
> > I propose two options for the meeting time:
> > (1). 11-12 on Wed morning
> > (2). 11-12 on Thu morning
> >
> > For those of you who are indeed interested in joining us, please
> > let me know in emails whether any one of the propsed time is good
> > for you. And, then, after I collect all the inputs, I will announce
> > tomorrow around 4:00 p.m. to the NEMO mailing list.
> >
> > Draft Agenda:
> > (1). Introduce ourselves
> > (2). status of all current drafts
> > (3). what should we really achieve regarding the security issue
> >      in NEMO?
> > (4). "how to achieve that goal" and hopefully some action items
> >      before the next IETF.
> >
> > Thanks. Any comments will be welcome.
> > -Felix
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. S. (Shyhtsun) Felix Wu                           wu@cs.ucdavis.edu
> Associate Professor                      http://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/~wu
> Computer Science Department                     office: 1-530-754-7070
> University of California at Davis               fax:    1-530-752-4767
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>