[nemo] proxy vagueness for IPv4 HoA in DS-MIPv6, draft-ietf-mip6-nemo-v4traversal-01.txt
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com> Thu, 11 May 2006 12:03 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe9tM-0005pw-BF; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:03:40 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe9tL-0005pm-K4 for nemo@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:03:39 -0400
Received: from motgate8.mot.com ([129.188.136.8]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe9tK-0005YG-Cx for nemo@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:03:39 -0400
Received: from il06exr01.mot.com (il06exr01.mot.com [129.188.137.131]) by motgate8.mot.com (8.12.11/Motgate7) with ESMTP id k4BCKngi002842 for <nemo@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:20:49 -0700 (MST)
Received: from zfr01srv02.crm.mot.com (zfr01srv02.crm.mot.com [10.161.201.8]) by il06exr01.mot.com (8.13.5/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4BCLADf006697 for <nemo@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:21:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [10.161.201.117] (zfr01-2117.crm.mot.com [10.161.201.117]) by zfr01srv02.crm.mot.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3000C865980 for <nemo@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:03:37 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <44632818.7000403@motorola.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:03:36 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ml-nemo WG <nemo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAQ=
X-White-List-Member: TRUE
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Subject: [nemo] proxy vagueness for IPv4 HoA in DS-MIPv6, draft-ietf-mip6-nemo-v4traversal-01.txt
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Some comments on proxy behaviour of DS-MIPv6 HA draft-ietf-mip6-nemo-v4traversal-01.txt. The draft currently says: > A home agent must also act as a proxy for address resolution in IPv4 > for the registered IPv4 home addresses of mobile nodes it is serving. The draft doesn't mention anything about ARP. I was wondering whether HA should do proxy ARP for the real IPv4 HoA or proxy ND for IPv4-mapped IPv6 address (derived from the IPv4 HoA). I personally think it should do proxy ARP and not proxy ND, because I don't know how ND works with IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. If so, maybe it should be specified in the draft. What do you think? Alex
- [nemo] proxy vagueness for IPv4 HoA in DS-MIPv6, … Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] proxy vagueness for IPv4 HoA in DS-MIP… Keiichi SHIMA