[nemo] Re: multihoming topics

[Chan-Wah Ng <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 13:42 +0200, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> Chan-Wah Ng wrote:
> 
> > Hello Alex,
> > 
> > On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:01 +0200, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> > 
> >> Thierry Ernst wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Dear all,
> >>> 
> >>> The NEMO WG will meet at Vancouver for a 2 hours session.
> >>> 
> >>> In Paris, we mentioned about rechartering the WG, so I think this
> >>> will be one of the important discussion: how are we
> >>> 
> >>> So, the main topics will be: 1. status of WG documents 2. RO PB
> >>> Statement 3. RO issues we should work on, and where 4.
> >>> Multihoming: what issues we should work on, and where 5.
> >>> Rechartering (mainly based on point 3 & 4)
> >> 
> >> Thierry, just a question.  I agree with most points in the agenda.
> >> 
> >> Isn't the 4th topic dealt with in Monami6 WG?  I mean, we already
> >> had extensive discussion slots at several NEMO meetings about what
> >> are the multi-homing issues and where should they be worked on.
> >> And then there was Monami6 BoF, and now Monami6 is created so they
> >> should logically be worked there, no?
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > In the upcoming -04 [*] of draft-ietf-nemo-multihoming-issues, I have
> >  clearly recommended which issues to be worked on by which WG.  There
> > are two points of considerations for the NEMO WG.
> 
> Well, I read the draft's recommendation as three not two NEMO topics:
> -(multiple) HA ingress filtering for (n,n,n).
> -review prefix delegation.
> -loop prevention.
> 

Sorry, it should be the first and last.  The review prefix delegation
part is a obviously-must-be-done.

/rgds
/cwng