IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netconf] New draft draft-lindblad-netconf-transaction-id-00

"Jan Lindblad (jlindbla)" <jlindbla@cisco.com> Mon, 09 November 2020 08:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jlindbla@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A163A0CC3 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 00:39:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=MgIqv5jf; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=ICv7yB/s
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wMbp9DeUzV4M for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 00:38:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580323A0CC1 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 00:38:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4249; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1604911138; x=1606120738; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=cQk5xbeT3+BseTK+6vZlEmQwDfee65jSYi/zGYcEbgI=; b=MgIqv5jfsBZzDQWzU5NOIwDCwsy+Cu1C+JJGkqRNePOsdWi+HrstLaIT JZL6fBdTqGM7d5A3TE6FC45bu2rHs7ypvcSc3dppfuQWDzdkqZY5A6wpj MsnRzs1biFNlRnO55is6FfbnwHHjWax1qfEeFOwyv9VuksQKM5bCbusic c=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0CvCAAN/6hffZxdJa1igQmDISMue1kvLgqHfAOhZ4RvglMDVAsBAQENAQEjCgIEAQGESoIUAiU4EwIDAQEBAwIDAQEBAQUBAQECAQYEFAEBhjwMhgsuAQE4EQEMdCcENYMEAYF+VwMuAQMLoiICgTuIaHSBNIMEAQEFgUdBRIJBGIIQAwaBOIJzikwbgUE/gTgcgk+DGwIDAYFDRYMdgiybAYwNkRwKgm0EiQmKUYcvAx+hcJ5HkWuDYgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBayGBWXAVZQGCPj4SFwINkhCFFIVEdDgCBgoBAQMJfIw7AYEQAQE
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:LJr/ixNYKZMeVs42pCgl6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEvKw33l7EQYud7OhL2KLasKHlDGoH55vJ8HUPa4dFWBJNj8IK1xchD8iIBQyeTrbqYiU2Ed4EWApj+He2YklYBMi4YEfd8TW+6DcIEUD5Mgx4bu3+Bo/ViZGx0Oa/s53eaglFnnyze7R3eR63tg7W8MIRhNhv
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,463,1596499200"; d="scan'208,217";a="621061823"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Nov 2020 08:38:57 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0A98cvaD000999 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:38:57 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 02:38:56 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 03:38:55 -0500
Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 03:38:55 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=WFaJCIlkfqhfqQfzAZ0zL1N1CfZ015P/zjCs+z7pS8P6yGPwqgRJXPxSJ/w+IgIdEmy9qCM6p8V5eS/sL7fbxeMyq8mfY1KsJ/+B48Kbn5bSLIvZa//u+x64M6A7DMniwbwFoFg4eQVicmTiln6Eh8oM/nJi3kGxmdUb7wG6KV5uHo0gs6mPtZhY2KUjABvZIJo8Q96Cacyaj4YrSfn9dhiE2SAY0Lf7S67z+6jnVhAON6FFHQKvUiVQzNEoNkQfM3YRaMHdTniJiDfTbnbGGMI4ngRUYPwJ+oHMUNXZlN9LG4vjB0XzvVh88MJJFvD2KEmD3QzSfqQMGgXAHzuI0g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=NDS8F7vGeRI9uWm5ugO9sJ7U/WRqsAPJ+D5Z+RW6Eds=; b=BtKyExymNL1F+OwTxNXnTkK2Hk+TRVdChI18axQb3dlG0qL4prCed7OpTLRehA/+dGmisMZo0KyPyjWigcyK3VvhOWS9Wbt13YwidjNZJGlyKh/bs3klYKWR+/OUOuo0tWcKnuhKOvZbcOl4on4ZEvMr7KxPDclbpFEAPiUEMyV4f86PTeC5bRYvxgfNGuizxqtZPKg+ZBJhg8mOvycxptgMiiUzMXUHiOjSwcKG13KHs8Mpdl1LpWGqLp5QPddmyMf/Fh70+FDGRTImqQae8+0d3G43qXFZNYIyNYgMsR91YcFIZ8OvIfx1M/uv7BEDhhqKj1SBNtoFgFeJ6DarDA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=NDS8F7vGeRI9uWm5ugO9sJ7U/WRqsAPJ+D5Z+RW6Eds=; b=ICv7yB/sCAN59JPzQVKhAg+OKb6I6L5brwK77wta7gPCik5t90I2yKnkTW1V/9kYjR2iVjxe7PpwNGGPo7zr2h40Ddr1cUPZfUcwlvYWGn6uxX86GFzBKP0qY8LFPmvsWa0PObm42BtZ9knH9Z/axb0H/Zb4tIa0F4pb3axrzMU=
Received: from DM6PR11MB2841.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:c8::32) by DM6PR11MB2874.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:c9::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3541.21; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:38:53 +0000
Received: from DM6PR11MB2841.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d8e:9b06:ef72:2a]) by DM6PR11MB2841.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d8e:9b06:ef72:2a%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3541.022; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:38:53 +0000
From: "Jan Lindblad (jlindbla)" <jlindbla@cisco.com>
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New draft draft-lindblad-netconf-transaction-id-00
Thread-Index: AQHWtnPB/gjKDCS5X0CD8qtneqcrKA==
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 08:38:53 +0000
Message-ID: <3BC1F76B-400E-44AB-909F-49A5420858C2@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [83.209.47.40]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1d8f1e88-054b-4947-9128-08d8848ae396
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB2874:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR11MB2874F5C2AE384A0273A582F1CAEA0@DM6PR11MB2874.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 9itLPZBeiOuxlJaJ3MlNMZoP8f7rFUv8uvHnLghRn4/GvbhT47/6oi+u9bNFdobooVBsUhYBUHW+srSkxggmFtCwwMR1t9RWApwHOR81sNHzTlYV5a0KHkuLaYEsfhR1cm/kd6W1i1oMrQHwxxoLIfXd+9HOSQiz94L1ecvtBWt0XkZdRiIBKrYDBVggclAAmdSKEjT1KKfe5VwjXWYua9+FHfKwPcw8KSh15C4oxF4Ds+HQuQVILZNATkxNFS7XGGNHRCdPD6lIhgCwF3XXDAa/TNZDLueVz5pBo7nVWP10kgu0sRLX8z1BxzJ+iF+31ajOQLCtcbkbVnxszl6KIqG1v4tfgfaaLXY1h9+TkJ8BBYa0PYAMG0/BdnjC1U2bH/guimqB9Ibn0pRGUwTsLQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR11MB2841.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(396003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(8936002)(91956017)(76116006)(66946007)(6916009)(2616005)(8676002)(166002)(186003)(6506007)(71200400001)(6512007)(33656002)(6486002)(5660300002)(26005)(2906002)(478600001)(966005)(66556008)(66446008)(66476007)(64756008)(4744005)(316002)(86362001)(36756003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3BC1F76B400E44AB909F49A5420858C2ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR11MB2841.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1d8f1e88-054b-4947-9128-08d8848ae396
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Nov 2020 08:38:53.0854 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: +ESiY9/Cyclv4/C5KJuD1jHn3TGb3uxpKFRj0x/XKxg+7zHTa4HDE5CXzUNFHl3vI+mDVu5HWnXEpRW2KU/XXQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB2874
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.11, xch-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/-MYW7D5lYhGscSm0FjYlggroK8A>
Subject: [netconf] New draft draft-lindblad-netconf-transaction-id-00
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 08:39:00 -0000

Hi all,

A few days ago I submitted a draft on a NETCONF extension for
more efficient client-server synchronization. Link below. Unfortunately,
I forgot to fill in the abstract in the submission, so it follows here:

NETCONF clients and servers often need to have a synchronized view of
the server's configuration data stores.  The volume of configuration
data in a server may be very large, while data store changes typically
are small when observed at typical client resynchronization intervals.

Rereading the entire data store and analyzing the response for changes
is a an inefficient mechanism for synchronization.  This document
specifies an extension to NETCONF that allows clients and servers to
keep synchronized with a much smaller data exchange and without any
need for servers to store information about the clients.


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lindblad-netconf-transaction-id/


Feel free to discuss here as well as on the IETF109 NETCONF meeting
on Nov 18th.

Best Regards,
/jan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email