RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points
"David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net> Tue, 29 November 2005 22:14 UTC
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhDkZ-00077B-Bg for netconf-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:14:59 -0500
Received: from psg.com (mailnull@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA17240 for <netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:14:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EhDbv-000Fql-5k for netconf-data@psg.com; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:06:03 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
Received: from [204.127.202.55] (helo=sccrmhc11.comcast.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EhDbu-000Fqa-Ec for netconf@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:06:02 +0000
Received: from djyxpy41 (c-24-62-247-149.hsd1.nh.comcast.net[24.62.247.149]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2005112922060101100hhujee>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:06:01 +0000
Reply-To: dbharrington@comcast.net
From: David B Harrington <dbharrington@comcast.net>
To: netconf@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:05:58 -0500
Message-ID: <034201c5f531$1403c080$0400a8c0@DJYXPY41>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Thread-Index: AcX0NMwfH6xm3qH0RXWfL+OGyBUB6AAAUqNQ
In-Reply-To: <438B2564.2060903@cisco.com>
Sender: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi, I personally prefer "notification" to "event message" because I would like to see consistency in the terminology used for IETF O&M protocols. There seem to be three variations - notification, event notification, and event message; everywhere event notification is used, the same document also refers to it simply as a notification, and no document seems to identify what other type of notification besides event notification is possible. Here's my research on the use of "notification" vs. "event message" in O&M documents: "notification" - SNMP (rfc3413), IPFIX requirements (rfc3917), Diameter (rfc3588), Syslog (rfc3164), Opsec Practices (draft-ietf-opsec-current-practices-02) "event message" - Syslog (rfc3164), netconf (draft-chisholm-netconf-event-01.txt) Widening this to a search of RFCs which use notification or event in their title, and checking for "notification" or "event message" in the text of the document: "notification" - Simple New Mail Notification (rfc4146), Requirements for IPP Notifications (rfc3997), Internet Printing Protocol (IPP): Event Notifications and Subscriptions (rfc3995), The SPIRITS (Services in PSTN requesting Internet Services) Protocol (rfc3910), A Presence Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (rfc3856), Message Disposition Notification (MDN) profile for Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) (rfc3503), An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status Notifications (rfc3464), Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications (DSNs) (rfc3461), Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)-Specific Event Notification (rfc3265), The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP (rfc3168), An INVITE-Initiated Dialog Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (rfc4235), Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for Event State Publication (rfc3903), etc. "event message" - Nuff said? David Harrington dbharrington@comcast.net -- to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
- NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andy Bierman
- RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Glenn Waters
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andy Bierman
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Ted Goddard
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Randy Presuhn
- RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andrea Westerinen (andreaw)
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andy Bierman
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Randy Presuhn
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andy Bierman
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andy Bierman
- RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andrea Westerinen (andreaw)
- terminolgy was Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consens… Tom Petch
- Re: terminolgy was Re: NETCONF Notifications: Con… Andy Bierman
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Eliot Lear
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andy Bierman
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Ted Goddard
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Phil Shafer
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andy Bierman
- RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Sharon Chisholm
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andy Bierman
- RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Hector Trevino (htrevino)
- RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points David B Harrington
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Phil Shafer
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Balazs Lengyel
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Phil Shafer
- RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Sharon Chisholm
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Chris Elliott
- RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points David B Harrington
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Balazs Lengyel
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andy Bierman
- RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Sharon Chisholm
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andy Bierman
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Andy Bierman
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Phil Shafer
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Tom Petch
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points Balazs Lengyel
- Questions on the Events draft ? Balazs Lengyel