IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netconf] Re: [core] [Cbor] Re: adding PEN-based SID allocation to RFC9595

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 06 April 2025 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: netconf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538EA18159EB; Sun, 6 Apr 2025 06:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hZlTW9_Q1nLw; Sun, 6 Apr 2025 06:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 604B918159E6; Sun, 6 Apr 2025 06:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.145] (p5089ae78.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZVtMj40YwzDCcL; Sun, 6 Apr 2025 15:23:45 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20250405233148.70257888@nuclight.lan>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 15:23:45 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 765638625.059438-5a89cc5f3ff4a590b593d826104c7257
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CAA2AED6-A109-474D-9F35-C7DEB8C3EBA4@tzi.org>
References: <17877.1740164613@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CABCOCHQxeV19j=5XHJz4UV3_nLbRHJ904d8GWyxQNdA9e2W_QA@mail.gmail.com> <71969CDA-5B3C-4160-A474-DA44A47DC7D6@tzi.org> <CABCOCHTnzW2sJ0zk0LEO14mimfshEGboyy2uxwhGfFEH_fr+LA@mail.gmail.com> <24966.1743788090@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CABCOCHQ7mg4rAit5a2sXkSJAfrTFqmf_4iqjDO85xhfY+B5GvA@mail.gmail.com> <20250405233148.70257888@nuclight.lan>
To: Vadim Goncharov <vadimnuclight@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Message-ID-Hash: CFJPQO3LJODP2L6EFPTZGZZZENKC35NR
X-Message-ID-Hash: CFJPQO3LJODP2L6EFPTZGZZZENKC35NR
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netconf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: core <core@ietf.org>, CBOR <cbor@ietf.org>, netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [netconf] Re: [core] [Cbor] Re: adding PEN-based SID allocation to RFC9595
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/0tyt1khp0zDeYNfMYZSSJ1Tv5ZI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netconf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netconf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netconf-leave@ietf.org>

On 2025-04-05, at 22:31, Vadim Goncharov <vadimnuclight@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> stone-age style static SID number allocation "once and forever".

A nice example of how the idea of static global allocation of code points totally fails is Unicode (*).

Grüße, Carsten

(*) Trying to write this in ASCII, or I would add an emoji expressing sarcasm.
Obviously, the rules for curating the Unicode space are very different from those for the SID space, but Unicode is the textbook example for why we are moving forward *towards* those global code-point spaces as opposed to away from them.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status