IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] [netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Mon, 29 January 2018 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9751314B1 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 16:41:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c2VkiZyFO_vw for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 16:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB7C12FB18 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 16:41:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1361; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1517186488; x=1518396088; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=P2+7prN+M8V7WvQyesjGe1+Ddw+hpMJf1oZqEmS6geg=; b=WPsUzRQn2U8zmFyHd6xjwoUN8xCAGV0rYpzP3pykjGY9HnootHwXoVUC li8owR35E82en7r1hmDqMmO6+nunwPYOeC/JN8Pdahsjqq8cw2Naj7rg8 eBAcupBZxKxsaHchGbOnY4IzyFYqukX5rDtz87YJ86MehPDttooHS9iIO g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DdAADDbG5a/4gNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNCZnUoCo16jmiCApdEFYICChgLhElPAoIeVBgBAQEBAQEBAQJrKIUjAQEBAwEBATg0EAsCAQgOKBAnCyUCBAESCIolCBCrOIpRAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGwWEVIIVgVeFFoMvAQECgTwBEgGGGwWkFAKME4lJgiSGIYttlzUCERkBgTsBHzlgcHAVPYIqhHd4jHCBJYEXAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,428,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="62350375"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jan 2018 00:41:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0T0fRVe017121 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:41:27 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 19:41:26 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 19:41:26 -0500
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01
Thread-Index: AQHTleAqmJIeAORwS0KCxIIo07busaOGzqYAgAM5PbA=
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:41:26 +0000
Message-ID: <08dacd196b6c47a285eade464d6b9ce7@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <78d9e3d5-e096-49cf-f3c5-acaf9fc8303a@labn.net> <CEF47075-CC65-4E4E-AF87-E8B8D3D22496@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <CEF47075-CC65-4E4E-AF87-E8B8D3D22496@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.228]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/2Gd75B3OgE8QMufONTes2Ip-e-g>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] [netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:41:33 -0000

I think this work is excellent.  I would like to see it adopted.

> Please take a moment to post support for the adoption of the yang-data-ext
> draft in the NETMOD working group.
> 
> Recall that one of the zerotouch last call comments resulted in a need for a
> draft such as this, in order to move its normative reference for the "yang-data"
> extension away from RFC 8040.
> 
> This modification is needed since some claim that rc:yang-data can't encode a
> top-level 'choice' statement even when it only has descendants that are
> containers.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Kent  // co-author on both drafts
> 
> 
> ===== original message =====
> Hi,
> 
> This is the start of a *two* week poll on making draft-bierman-netmod-yang-
> data-ext a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating
> "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your
> reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide
> comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> 
> This poll ends on February 8.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Lou (and Co-chairs)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email