Re: [netconf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-14.txt

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Tue, 11 June 2019 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43D312004A for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=eTuzy5ZV; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=liJoM0cG
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xgmvs1aqmL1Q for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1387E120048 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9623; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1560288471; x=1561498071; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=7lsc+0nSPXv7pRnYwgMKdL8VUZJEQci1kd/S5Jd0ZwU=; b=eTuzy5ZVmotS8hiZw+QoCAo+Lc30wVF54a0pMcmgM5eSuJn31BRARrj/ qDhS/DadmyRYIrRTYbiblJxV3dGCOf4CRhcWygRP8OZom6HZbf149gbtK mJaB0I53BXYjCHt7YjIScIBXgr6Bg9qXywaLit039qAsmrBNTG3ijL3Ql s=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AYkXxdhRCuqdKFQPt0DLKuZ7L/tpsv++ubAcI9p?= =?us-ascii?q?oqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBdfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH1?= =?us-ascii?q?5g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOjYgFcRHXVlN9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BIAACCGwBd/5BdJa1mHAEBAQQBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQGBUQcBAQsBgQ4vUANqVSAECygKhAuDRwOEUooMgjIlkmCEU4EugSQDVAk?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEMAQEjCgIBAYRAAheCZyM0CQ4BAwEBBAEBAgEEbRwMhUoBAQEBAxIRHQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BNwEPAgEGAhEDAQIrAgICMB0IAgQOBSKDAAGBHU0DHQEOjXGQYAKBOIhfcYE?= =?us-ascii?q?xgnkBAQWBNgKBD4I9GIIPAwaBNAGLXBeBQD+BOAwTgkw+gmECAhiBZw2CXTK?= =?us-ascii?q?CJo4qhHCIQY1aCQKCEJNFG5cio1UCBAIEBQIOAQEFgU84gVhwFWUBgkGCD4N?= =?us-ascii?q?whRSFP3KBKY4pAYEgAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,363,1557187200"; d="scan'208,217";a="290225697"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Jun 2019 21:27:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com (xch-rcd-016.cisco.com [173.37.102.26]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5BLRnfh003264 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:27:49 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:27:49 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 17:27:48 -0400
Received: from NAM05-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:27:47 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7lsc+0nSPXv7pRnYwgMKdL8VUZJEQci1kd/S5Jd0ZwU=; b=liJoM0cGbKCL9nc4BCJEyjm596c0DYUrpF33iCtZD4MG3vKgt2UeduX7cYWDTsv4vedAIhUWs5g9NC4D/JGKxo7YQhDlpCiUh0F07gAFdA/VDWRf6GVQ9j5Ukj6jBQODXK/c6IJLeeoEtNr2g15gabAEM/zT/4yq32eukzTxjrQ=
Received: from CY4PR1101MB2102.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.79.15) by CY4PR1101MB2214.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.76.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1987.11; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:27:46 +0000
Received: from CY4PR1101MB2102.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8cee:8a:a2b2:9203]) by CY4PR1101MB2102.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8cee:8a:a2b2:9203%10]) with mapi id 15.20.1965.017; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:27:46 +0000
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netconf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-14.txt
Thread-Index: AQHVH+OIt5gTv/gUmU6bsvyUrop6/qaVRN8AgAFprYD//9Q0AIAAdAIA//+9VIA=
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:27:46 +0000
Message-ID: <A14BBEB1-2B9A-4174-B30F-B4BC7686953B@cisco.com>
References: <156020896295.32199.7617469401232263908@ietfa.amsl.com> <F45C8148-7D85-4F9E-A2EA-CD58DBCA86E6@cisco.com> <0100016b477bd2b9-b33bafa5-224c-43d4-9467-0ffbdae769e6-000000@email.amazonses.com> <0537B9CE-83CF-4E5C-95AC-ABEB46C92804@cisco.com> <0100016b48687180-05d46ca8-d13d-46ba-93e7-cac92b63e392-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <0100016b48687180-05d46ca8-d13d-46ba-93e7-cac92b63e392-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.6.190114
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rrahman@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.82]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1065ad2e-c135-435b-8cba-08d6eeb3a5c6
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:CY4PR1101MB2214;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY4PR1101MB2214:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY4PR1101MB2214227F0BC9ABCDB8CF1AA5ABED0@CY4PR1101MB2214.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 006546F32A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(189003)(199004)(316002)(478600001)(36756003)(66946007)(4326008)(606006)(2616005)(81166006)(14454004)(11346002)(73956011)(99286004)(476003)(76116006)(91956017)(66476007)(66446008)(66556008)(8936002)(64756008)(58126008)(3846002)(486006)(53936002)(2906002)(256004)(6116002)(5660300002)(7736002)(6506007)(33656002)(229853002)(6916009)(53546011)(102836004)(26005)(25786009)(6436002)(6486002)(86362001)(68736007)(186003)(6512007)(54896002)(236005)(81156014)(6306002)(6246003)(8676002)(446003)(71190400001)(76176011)(66066001)(71200400001)(9326002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR1101MB2214; H:CY4PR1101MB2102.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: sypQ/RHmEZAbeQWgp3IsqDEuS4BEWgcWJs2jPdFDr+srKNiQf5ASkm2y6WoF/cuGlbRQnMenpgzfSR/VNvIgqXGjAUO9GmROsnla44jBPxRormHMjqE6Wj9NaME62aD/7dD2vCgf8WGqHNvKQqYVrGQi749G24jwh3EDGPJEWQfeexsWwB5mlyU8ufGQk6LGly6Hn7Ak5Gq02JcPz7xJQQSO3Qsc5xiywI39JslkG/av8CDxcHSam1j5/vXR9BilNEPYLbSk4inERPuzKg96nMTbcTX5UktXnyWESo1CBg7ORts//VRj4px4dPxNU1NHUlK65pdd9PaA14fUKC3LuFmDj5Fy8vXeNC2wZiosOMTY3bHVHmrXKDYc21aXThRob25mFeVpGp/30oT7d6G7mVhSdkIL2cNS/hTD+KxlL3E=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A14BBEB12B9A4174B30FB4BC7686953Bciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1065ad2e-c135-435b-8cba-08d6eeb3a5c6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Jun 2019 21:27:46.5431 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: rrahman@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR1101MB2214
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.26, xch-rcd-016.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/3KPDnWE_6rxcYm5YloKU0FiK9LE>
Subject: Re: [netconf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-14.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:27:54 -0000

Hi Kent,

OK.  Everywhere to me means section 3.4 and section 4 (where I’ll change the text to “when HTTP2 is used”), good?

The HTTP2 text has been there since the conversion, it is not a recent add.

Regards,
Reshad.


From: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
Date: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 5:18 PM
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netconf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-14.txt


Hi Reshad,


Yes, this is over RESTCONF so http1.1/http2 are both ok. One change<https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-08> which was done ~8 months ago is to have 1 callflow “over RESTCONF/SSE” as opposed to the previous separate callflows for http1.1 and http2. The reason http2 is mentioned in a few places is because of http2 streams. Section 4 already mentions “where HTTP2 is available to…”, so it looks like section 3.4 is the only place missing “when HTTP2 is used”?

I recall that conversion and hence my alarm seeing all the HTTP2 text.  Yes, adding "when/if HTTP2 is used" everywhere, to constantly remind the reader that it may not always be the case would be good.

For Section 4, would replacing "where HTTP2 transport is available" with "when the HTTP2 transport is used" be better?


Kent // contributor