IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] {+restconf}/data vs <running>

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Wed, 26 September 2018 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16EB130EA2 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 03:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nWGcsSbBurRZ for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 03:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de (atlas5.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B853E130E7F for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 03:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D96468F; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:58:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.217]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 0TVpz60oUvET; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:58:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:58:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.47]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468D020035; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:58:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QzMSzO1uuKPh; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:58:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from exchange.jacobs-university.de (SXCHMB01.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "exchange.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBCA220031; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:58:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from anna.localdomain (10.50.218.117) by sxchmb03.jacobs.jacobs-university.de (10.70.0.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.1415.2; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:58:14 +0200
Received: by anna.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0419D2552571; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:58:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:58:13 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
CC: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180926105813.5o47jfszwefzwloa@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <87lg7osfjt.fsf@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87lg7osfjt.fsf@nic.cz>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-ClientProxiedBy: SXCHMB03.jacobs.jacobs-university.de (10.70.0.155) To sxchmb03.jacobs.jacobs-university.de (10.70.0.155)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/3SO1T9aGCB1K9G9rbz4S0LA_gZk>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] {+restconf}/data vs <running>
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:58:23 -0000

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:45:26PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf is silent about the relationship
> between the {+restconf}/data and the <running> datastore, and it cannot
> be deduced from RFC 8040 either, because it only says in sec. 3.3.1:
> 
>    This mandatory resource [{+restconf}/data] represents the combined
>    configuration and state data resources that can be accessed by a
>    client.
> 
> I think this is a serious omission.

We are not changing {+restconf}/data.
 
> Regarding draft-lhotka-netconf-restconf-transactions-00, I received a
> lot of criticism for changing the semantics of
> {+restconf}/data. However, I don't think it was the case: according to
> the above definition, it seems perfectly OK if {+restconf}/data
> represents combined configuration **from <staging>** and state data.

Perhaps people had the impression that your proposal changes
{+restconf}/data or that it should work with the NMDA solution.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email