Re: [netconf] WGLC on SZTP CSR draft

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 18 March 2021 02:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1C53A1B5C; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id luY21t8YWKk7; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE323A1B5B; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id r17so433217pgi.0; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=PW69amx3f6doS1CVOJa3tAoSfcfaN8UfQQKEEW7ujkU=; b=jJyOBkgtMTLKBmkZR0RgQlRWjMmS6npnjBWgzBfYTJIp5aPyMhViHid/MKshVOs508 sMqpdSGYpapw/6iflZo27LARHx6db4RV/2v/w5t+znLeQ9qD7NB0bICfXws8W31lYtBs dxfBh/PGQXM9NDmXL0ANDSTU+nlDN+3/t+WCCT2u9o035j+tZyMR1TMe0BdA3JPyOU/v 4TzJtyLpFAKZNfvFfQA+/zOS3/awU3eLBthGqgR9ty0GVee7xS+/U3qB4M3cjdrHk8sT UBxZqqyXUC9T2GYIEk3usThQiyvaQ2v5wolUT/7mnTZVbHEHwDbx0i5hTdR212hTTGCM nw2w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=PW69amx3f6doS1CVOJa3tAoSfcfaN8UfQQKEEW7ujkU=; b=MQAYMP8Ft+DjVQBD5TNp374lrABlUtbCW14r2lCAcjxrAcoZla2TAp5AsKL8hwvg3l rAYBwp/CFdPavge1bv9pYtq7NAMzGFPwZsy/Nepnc8HUgyHJSOh69DqGk/a8hIoxtvqj kbDkzOgnjZmKcXrmMKS+R3QzzaMGZvj4d6PsuHahioMXa4Xbn6b3LiU2xnvecAcYRqQl xpG/c0qW/ZKtT2GZSTtrKVJIVgvBPhVJm+hFwcxADyCiJrWMmhP+btSLsFSgaaQx+x5r S0reyU/1uFbEd2xUUar5tWoI27MNwpDGjSm/gcAxeIpjDepaw5fwGYDOhYgG2XFGy1fe Nj0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FpO1fP52v/sY8S/x23/wXlBaCWPgAaDm09keXboX2Tc0y6VZD vCTsklr7RyjEaC7c4wOvFaHm0tJPumEBIg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx05vOnhL/X5TrkV9RqbJfgcAymk3pwr0TpSool9P7ziWRv1TkREw/mspmUjWIhTO58jDRacg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:e5e:: with SMTP id 30mr5145573pgo.181.1616033672908; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:241e:a54:5e91:2c30? ([2601:647:5600:5020:241e:a54:5e91:2c30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v25sm354784pfn.51.2021.03.17.19.14.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <B5E930E0-B50C-49D6-87DD-B29F830CA679@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CC6513E4-1413-4A45-AD50-641ADF84624F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:14:31 -0700
In-Reply-To: <14B11029-19C9-47D2-9215-4236E69BD6BE@gmail.com>
Cc: netconf-chairs <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <EF435A72-83FD-4D80-BF68-00628571F63C@gmail.com> <14B11029-19C9-47D2-9215-4236E69BD6BE@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/7pi7UY0V6WhSVxT9N4DUuPp4cFU>
Subject: Re: [netconf] WGLC on SZTP CSR draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 02:14:36 -0000

We did not receive any comments or objections to the publication of this draft. At this time, I will go ahead and close the LC on the draft, and get it ready for publication.

Thanks.

> On Feb 23, 2021, at 6:12 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> We have not received any comments on this draft. 
> 
> The document had been reviewed extensively even before it was put on LC. So this was more of an opportunity for anyone else who wanted to provide comments, to do so. With that in mind, and because we are close to the virtual meeting, we are extending the call till after IETF 110. At that time, if there are no objections and no more comments are received, we will get this document ready for publication.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
>> On Jan 11, 2021, at 3:00 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> We are starting a 2 week WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-sztp-csr which is at version -01.
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-sztp-csr/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-sztp-csr/>
>> 
>> Please respond on this thread indicating your support or concerns about why this document should/should not be adopted.
>> 
>> We are particularly interested in statement of the form:
>> 
>> - I have reviewed the draft and found no issues. 
>> - I have reviewed the draft and found the following issues …
>> 
>> This WGLC will conclude on Monday, January 25. An IPR call has already been issued separately.
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Mahesh & Kent (as co-chairs)
> 
> Mahesh & Kent (as co-chairs)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Mahesh & Kent (as co-chairs)