Re: [Netconf] activate-configured-subecription - WGLC subscribed-notifications-16

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Wed, 19 September 2018 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05F0130E37 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 02:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7WL6pRU6gon for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 02:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E5D130E58 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 02:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0BFD1EFDE2755 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:15:36 +0100 (IST)
Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:15:37 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.200]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:15:32 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
CC: "evoit=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org" <evoit=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "douglas@hubler.us" <douglas@hubler.us>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] activate-configured-subecription - WGLC subscribed-notifications-16
Thread-Index: AQHUSpBgBUFGD5oy2kmpOilc7/EuyqTuKlmAgACurwCAAAD1gIAFUEkAgAG9NoCAAAwnAIAAICCAgAATFYCAAM5uAP//w1YAgACXhhD//4SBgIAAhzDw
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:15:32 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9B04B677@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9B04B16C@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20180919.092522.1558587282279688362.mbj@tail-f.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9B04B604@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20180919.110541.1111834445198880499.mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180919.110541.1111834445198880499.mbj@tail-f.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.33.244]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/8-H1upyRiu6AMe2SBxb787MslVE>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] activate-configured-subecription - WGLC subscribed-notifications-16
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:15:43 -0000

> Therefore HTTP/2 Server Push is not desirable comparing with 
> HTTP1.1+SSE

Note that the diagram above assumes HTTP/2 + SSE.  It just shows how PUSH_PROMISE could be used with HTTP/2 + SSE.

[Qin]: Maybe this is implementation specific issue, but how does the server know when to use Server Push for PUSH_PROMISE and when to use SSE.
I just SSE and Server PUSH are very similar. Enabling both mechanism coulds confuse the server.


/martin