[Netconf] server-model update plan
Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Wed, 02 September 2015 21:35 UTC
Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2951B548A for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cxfn84R8srHP for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0709.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::709]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74DA51B546A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.140) by CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.256.15; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:35:25 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.27]) by CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0256.013; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:35:25 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: server-model update plan
Thread-Index: AQHQ3BnrLPjAGz0mjUW2/r4jNdAmSw==
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 21:35:25 +0000
Message-ID: <D1FCA74F.D0862%kwatsen@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.4.140807
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.14]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO1PR05MB458; 5:oHLfR4hyKCgLAzaCUYHvd454YLoRACCda0CrLy5psiJyiUCxHI/ACyX1+hZB+pqjUMtED548y6cN52IJE2n9iFOT4izgzdR+lCnWUZzC1avugGlkbFTScxgWqVbPKbr7OpJl0ck8dSDJ/M4eX4h6Vw==; 24:bKuxF80AlGLmDKpJAqLgsSBggE08Xgg8/KwPWTU7IkTR90jrvGdPRYCysjG9gCyj66/FoVWI1WbXJ86/MYm2gzZaPPpuApe2VtFpnT2ZQUM=; 20:IIS/V1KXvCOQ/sDIKFXdWnB1syIqG94lrnjoKZysngwlQxWJ1kJU2s7hlm6oVc8Qktn7Mq/xVJcaPdhMKehqOQ==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB458;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO1PR05MB4581A8F4713C8A7E5FF2C2CA5690@CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:CO1PR05MB458; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO1PR05MB458;
x-forefront-prvs: 0687389FB0
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(164054003)(199003)(189002)(122556002)(10400500002)(87936001)(46102003)(2501003)(92566002)(5001960100002)(5001830100001)(2900100001)(86362001)(19580395003)(83506001)(110136002)(189998001)(5004730100002)(107886002)(5001860100001)(40100003)(5007970100001)(97736004)(68736005)(106116001)(99286002)(105586002)(16236675004)(15975445007)(102836002)(54356999)(101416001)(81156007)(4001350100001)(450100001)(77156002)(106356001)(50986999)(64706001)(4001540100001)(36756003)(62966003)(5002640100001)(229853001)(66066001)(2351001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB458; H:CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D1FCA74FD0862kwatsenjunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Sep 2015 21:35:25.0624 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR05MB458
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/8wASCnSNPsS9S6qnRZtJxLHxSKY>
Subject: [Netconf] server-model update plan
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 21:35:31 -0000
The consensus from IETF 93 was for the server-model draft to pursue the keychain-based approach documented in Appendix A in the current draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-07#appendix-A). There was also discussion regarding where to do the work, where it was decided to sort out next steps and work-split with Security Area. To this end, I have discussed this with past and present Security ADs, who are signaling that we should keep the draft in the NETCONF WG. And, to address the issue of ensuring Security area expert review, I have been invited to present the work at the SAAG meeting at IETF 94 - the idea is to raise interest there and hopefully pickup some individuals to work with us on it. So, with this in mind, I plan to update the current draft shortly and submit it as -08, to the NETCONF WG. Thanks, Kent
- [Netconf] server-model update plan Kent Watsen