[Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6536 (3409)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 15 November 2012 12:38 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4238821F887A for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 04:38:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.054
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.054 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.546, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eiYyqpYbUO-0 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 04:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8AE21F853D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 04:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 963F6B1E004; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 04:31:43 -0800 (PST)
To: andy@yumaworks.com, mbj@tail-f.com, rbonica@juniper.net, bclaise@cisco.com, bertietf@bwijnen.net, mehmet.ersue@nsn.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20121115123143.963F6B1E004@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 04:31:43 -0800
Cc: netconf@ietf.org, jernej.tuljak@mg-soft.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6536 (3409)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:38:46 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6536, "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6536&eid=3409 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Jernej Tuljak <jernej.tuljak@mg-soft.com> Section: 3.4.6 Original Text ------------- * The rule does not have a "rule-type" defined or the "rule- type" is "notification" and the "notification-name" is "*" and equals the name of the notification. Corrected Text -------------- * The rule does not have a "rule-type" defined or the "rule- type" is "notification" and the "notification-name" is "*" or equals the name of the notification. Notes ----- The "notification-name" element may either have a value of "*" OR contains the name of the notification. This typo appears in section 3.4.6, authorization step 7, second bullet. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6536 (draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model Publication Date : March 2012 Author(s) : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Configuration Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6536 (34… RFC Errata System
- Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6536… Martin Bjorklund