Re: [Netconf] namespace issue in the sample <hello> in RFC474 2 netconf over ssh

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 07 October 2009 07:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1364D3A683D for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.901, BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pgBM3QlYfK99 for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (de-0316.d.ipeer.se [213.180.79.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF6D3A67E5 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (c213-100-167-236.swipnet.se [213.100.167.236]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D6F7616018; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:23:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:23:35 +0200
Message-Id: <20091007.092335.142865395.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: shikhar@schmizz.net
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <309bec650910070013g129abe0eueebbd1fb0949807@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1254765747.450910030@192.168.1.70> <fc31fc75ef0.4acbbf4e@huaweisymantec.com> <309bec650910070013g129abe0eueebbd1fb0949807@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.0.51 on Emacs 22.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] namespace issue in the sample <hello> in RFC474 2 netconf over ssh
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:22:02 -0000

shikhar <shikhar@schmizz.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:06 PM, WashamFan <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com>
> > I don't think the implementation is a compliant one. (Maybe, the
> > implementation can interoperate with a complicant one)
> 
> Not without a workaround. Well, technically it is compliant with RFC
> 4742 but non-compliant with RFC 4741, so that's a bug that needs
> fixing.

Even 4742 says:

   [...] which MUST be followed by a <hello> element in the 'NETCONF'
   namespace.

I think it is clear that the example in 4742 which doesn't have a
namespace is a bug.

Chairs: should we file an errata for this?


/martin