IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] WG Last Call Comments ondraft-ietf-netconf-reverse-ssh-03.txt

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Tue, 13 May 2014 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1A61A024C for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 15:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fpTg-biCVqsC for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 15:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1lp0139.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582AF1A0123 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 15:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BN1PR05MB456.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.59.26) by BN1PR05MB454.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.59.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.939.12; Tue, 13 May 2014 22:33:46 +0000
Received: from BN1PR05MB456.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.3.208]) by BN1PR05MB456.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.3.204]) with mapi id 15.00.0939.000; Tue, 13 May 2014 22:33:45 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] WG Last Call Comments ondraft-ietf-netconf-reverse-ssh-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPU0KVQTfYkuZcEUioVZNKor+uVZsro1aWgAfuBgCAAXRlEYAAS5QAgAFCeQGAAhhMgIAEWebjgAARYgCAAfXVgA==
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 22:33:44 +0000
Message-ID: <CF97E25D.6FBB8%kwatsen@juniper.net>
References: <201403251517.LAA15291@adminfs.snmp.com> <CF58ED17.65F0C%kwatsen@juniper.net> <533D47CF.30402@bwijnen.net> <01f401cf5342$4d48d740$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <032f01cf6524$71cb2340$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <5368C366.8070509@bwijnen.net> <023701cf69d5$abcfb320$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <CF8FD96F.6E752%kwatsen@juniper.net> <007201cf6a9c$aa76f980$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <CF929D94.6F4D4%kwatsen@juniper.net> <00da01cf6dd5$ce36e740$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <CF9664F8.6F7B6%kwatsen@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <CF9664F8.6F7B6%kwatsen@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.1.140326
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-forefront-prvs: 0210479ED8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(428001)(164054003)(189002)(199002)(4396001)(54356999)(36756003)(64706001)(99396002)(86362001)(92566001)(83506001)(21056001)(76176999)(20776003)(77982001)(83322001)(92726001)(79102001)(99286001)(76482001)(46102001)(66066001)(85852003)(50986999)(74502001)(81542001)(74662001)(80022001)(87936001)(83072002)(101416001)(81342001)(2656002)(31966008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR05MB454; H:BN1PR05MB456.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <5CAFBFDE61A7F048A2379E2AD85910C7@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/FRN6FcqXRUf_sjvkjYX1HqokrHs
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG Last Call Comments ondraft-ietf-netconf-reverse-ssh-03.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 22:33:58 -0000

Hi Tom, 

I think we should close this discussion with resolution of not moving any
text to 5539bis.   

I would be OK moving text to a generic "call home" draft, but the WG
already decided against that approach.  Too bad, as there is quite a bit
in addition to S.5; for instance, look at S.3 "Benefits to Device
Management" and parts of S.7 "Security Considerations".  All of it seems
to apply to nearly any call-home solution.  Oh well.

If you recall, this thread began by your saying reverse-ssh wasn't ready
for LC.  Since then, we've:
 - changed all the "reverse ssh" references to "call home"
 - updated the abstract and introduction sections
 - added that PGP keys also satisfy the RECOMMENDED key algorithm criteria
 - clarified why a device config model is out of scope (e.g., Informative)
 
But this last bit about moving text to 5539bis seems questionable and not
worth it discussing further.  So, can we agree to close this particular
discussion now?   If so, then I'll post -06 so the draft can enter LC
again.

Thanks,
Kent

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email