IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] More comments was Shepherd's comments on draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Fri, 26 January 2024 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <0100018d47de8853-6f0d5429-2866-41b5-9a8c-9381e3db7484-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE565C14F704 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:23:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9crCeOiOTCZ for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:23:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a48-95.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-95.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB364C14F61F for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:23:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1706307782; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:Feedback-ID; bh=O4Q0sVWebmvVhTL8Q7wpkDFyiE5IhXAURD9wbXq7S5w=; b=F7GdQVjOuRnNtyLZStIcw8K42AaBBXIfUIY9k9ZHpoWx3HP6NP8ZEULPZqMoiyR+ WFrYDCFFzesxCDqs3wDk2/FiwnWiMNeRek+PgcyE35UImNb7leHWKGh+XY0JveADdXF 6+v4sX8t923ybmyARLxCTzZKalHwlg8BQiAMOenQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\))
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR07MB31819689DD5FDF9A437CB2EAA0752@VI1PR07MB3181.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:23:02 +0000
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <0100018d47de8853-6f0d5429-2866-41b5-9a8c-9381e3db7484-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <BBA86E54-570B-4257-A67F-CBBD37F62CC6@gmail.com> <010001850717709c-1c366be3-81ff-461b-a35e-6ccf83b98a52-000000@email.amazonses.com> <AM7PR07MB624814A8E0C4A0CA86B2F3CFA0FD9@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <01000185fb52d9f5-7772ba8d-c2f8-465a-9c9b-0e37f39bd6aa-000000@email.amazonses.com> <AM7PR07MB6248217B93BCE5766BF42E1DA0AB9@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <01000186948dc409-575773cc-db41-4bb8-807c-53b65807be20-000000@email.amazonses.com> <AM7PR07MB62485440A0D85DF3D8B611BDA0B59@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <VI1PR07MB31819689DD5FDF9A437CB2EAA0752@VI1PR07MB3181.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.01.26-54.240.48.95
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/GBkHGNqMcJi8EXLqP0UEgSDiwwE>
Subject: Re: [netconf] More comments was Shepherd's comments on draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:23:07 -0000

We both found the same this just now (see my other email sent just now).
Sorry, I should’ve looked at and replied to this message first.

Cheers,
Kent


> On Jan 22, 2024, at 7:39 AM, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> Kent
> 
> Reviving a thread from a year ago; 6125bis is now an RFC9525  so 6125 shows up as obsoleted.
> 
> I have not compared the two RFC in any detail.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: netconf <netconf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
> Sent: 09 March 2023 12:48
> To: Kent Watsen
> 
> From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
> Sent: 27 February 2023 20:26
> 
>> RFC6125 has a bis in WGLC
>> 
>> But we're okay with the current version - yes?  Do we need to MISREF?
>> 
>> <tp>
>> 
>> The issue is likely to be that 6125bis gets advanced before this so 6125 will show up as an obsolete reference and 6125bis has a lot of changes a bit like TLS1.3 has a lot of changes compared to TLS1.2 and I do not know if 6125bis will be ok or will need some templating in the way that TLS1.3 does before it is usable by anyone else:-(
>> 
>> 
>> The bis doc:
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/>
>> [ietf-logo-card.png]
>> Service Identity in TLS<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/>
>> datatracker.ietf.org<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/>
> 
> 
> Searching for "6125" in all the drafts reveals just one hit - as a "reference" inside iertf-crypto-types.yang for the "generate-csr" action.  Honestly, I don't know why it is there, as It it not clear from the context...and a searching mail-archives doesn't find any explanations.   I'm happy to remove the reference altogether...
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> <tp>
> I agree that that is the only reference.  It is sort of relevant to generating a certificate but I am content to see it go.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> Kent
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email