IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] What is the response structure when querying a specific instance object in a list?

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Wed, 17 April 2024 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3D5C14F5EB for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dN-80hGi7-Hb for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0873AC14CE24 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2a6fa7773d3so49968a91.3 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks.com; s=google; t=1713376925; x=1713981725; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1h6i87hzJSRhcaBcBwzC1IiCyOlOwZwVBADAKXvoEWc=; b=Cv6i8lSWPiRuljOlUepOXOgzZrGkVzZ2ysjHkq2IECO0yRR4T/QZurWfIaDmy63dC8 l3UbTglfIqycTIQBIpkqrZ4B7rHDOBqiUEiXGvD1Wu/+4GxTftZMWfCBc2M/6cOPQrhh sagdX4VJuAm7dITpo3twjhxJL3ifyLVmyfE12ivbDW5tnEUen5dG3M8QyT8GBPIqarie TZUT+L3lug3yL6wnXPkfviy2co2YnNG0sPIYJQr40ZWC7Wjhl1d6x7jtHLW8Y6SY/pDw C8GzKMewihFFzd/Psemi/XNZkBa48+bc7Kyr1g/fM1MivJ6oTd9NzjyyKggKa4J5cSFw QFXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713376925; x=1713981725; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=1h6i87hzJSRhcaBcBwzC1IiCyOlOwZwVBADAKXvoEWc=; b=JQanpUgNmjB6MDa+eZo2K9N3jBS4h59BbWrttM6tVRO+NgcoJiPmT9DTRCniCwlZ6V 7pGrkSZzoR5c3lVVpYGS+Eg/t/XY5s92FAW6syNnMOH63KI5LJXI0koCkwgy8fJLYASp Oc3tjmcHV86rcOXNkVWUmzapDstVqGeoINM9fxXMrI8vxueajpbF2yq/fD1dpSTd++Vm p+Z0sot9/pDhPCRYqIB8lDZ7MdOtoFM3k6WV7BWohObmEd0ckoZ6K7U1VWZXdmtfsW3X xMqb9lU86BwH0d6Pqz6YTTz55kgumYpYA7aoEjSEWoY1Pt4rvf/p9zzN7/B0V9b3BYkz yd1g==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUgK8cI9wMKxmlf/sUf8C6dESAGVyn2xthtIzmT/YDlnpSiOnRNzMi9Ht+yyO8POjKJi6147ekeLBDt2R9Dz7FK
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxhLKfgMaq+wKQDNZI8M7Qe6MJSbnNkxrEZax8Cp/oSs/FXR0AW cq/KT2QD9UARn9GQMuDC+wmExIapGO7TjCQUf+oZX1lNARkHBfrmgBSVP2HpR8D17A/UiWjEd4U GR7sQu5W9YYz99RtFmX99Z+6Xuqi89cIM3ysXsg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGDa+QMEj0Rnw0AtdDqob6RhfMKsanqKyKFZr67DFDTHTjHbgxNmEo2MNldfoS2rgN0N/Zk6mv+BjlCXBczx8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:788:b0:2a5:1fcf:efa8 with SMTP id l8-20020a17090b078800b002a51fcfefa8mr129757pjz.25.1713376925204; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <dec8b1969a8f4511bb99b550407f23d7@huawei.com> <CACvbXWEjB=i6T6JoaCKH3a=eFQ00n2tw2nXfUJkJ_LMgaBQCYg@mail.gmail.com> <0100018eecd3312d-adb42068-b6bf-4608-8797-1e77599b8817-000000@email.amazonses.com> <CABCOCHRdcOTES4EkOvqeYjPGc5FH6J=Bz0nnpabBo5vcRXr=zA@mail.gmail.com> <0100018eed130134-ec331f66-0ad8-43c6-9e5f-46db6afe0fb0-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <0100018eed130134-ec331f66-0ad8-43c6-9e5f-46db6afe0fb0-000000@email.amazonses.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:01:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHTjh0ViAx+0x5h9+UiPqN=OcNgM8ki3UbyQzUdPgbV5kg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
Cc: Per Andersson <per.ietf@ionio.se>, Olof Hagsand <olof@hagsand.se>, yuchaode <yuchaode=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, "yanglin (N)" <yanglin60@huawei.com>, liuzhoulong <liuzhoulong@huawei.com>, "Wangxi(Cordelia)" <wangxi114@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fe6d3606164ea60b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/ICFxfkfn_MNIf-kyJ2aCHltWmL4>
Subject: Re: [netconf] What is the response structure when querying a specific instance object in a list?
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:02:10 -0000

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:20 AM Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net> wrote:

> Hi Andy,
>
> On Apr 17, 2024, at 1:05 PM, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote:
>
> A list is always encoded as an array, even if one entry is returned.
> YumaPro follows RFC 7951:
>
>         A list instance is encoded as a name/array pair, and the array elements
> are JSON objects.
>
>
> Just to confirm, YumaPro returns the enclosing square brackets when a
> single list-element is returned?
>
>
Yes -- that is how a JSON array is encoded -- a list is an array of objects


> Kent
>
>
Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email