IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Netconf] should onboarding information *set* the debug level?

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Wed, 22 August 2018 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D056B130E01 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jt_tdT16zONg for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7C77130DFE for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108162.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7MH3O90006614 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:03:42 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=EQZs5ZVQ0gAiXoCVeSfBXGjXg1BKB0lXnZFS+z93deA=; b=ZnD1YVhltTDqd9qt8A6mRbsv1/D4d8mSMycRBfFqS1qlxiu/xcVhGaOjffiqd9VxEWHS dR/IF+0BxxRImYn5dp7r3I6TBXn4JwXr81VFuaPsOe45R+f47zmFlqeXKVvVOHsNi9yK LekidTBoGRUvvjHt4TrQ/BtPj1tZxDsUumUXeV64rGKrBZ0xhmMCey3qj2kER7haN/d8 3DXhbodkiFLz6jOLtMyYD2VmYbU8P+HIfaRZTXlUUAKcFiVNRE4x70YNZYr9WEmbVffe ACH8zT7NNTedfcJ2erOvnaeLNN0G5SYF8gqcDUty6L64LiT5hYSARXtaRhnAmegML9tR pg==
Received: from nam03-co1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03lp0020.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.181.20]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2m19908d63-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:03:42 -0700
Received: from DM6PR05MB4665.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.176.109.202) by DM6PR05MB4364.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.176.78.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1080.11; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:03:40 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB4665.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::14ab:9da7:be4a:fbaf]) by DM6PR05MB4665.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::14ab:9da7:be4a:fbaf%4]) with mapi id 15.20.1080.010; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:03:40 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: should onboarding information *set* the debug level?
Thread-Index: AQHUOjoTl0SCyhNbn0ywZuAA5UHWGw==
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:03:40 +0000
Message-ID: <96A50A4C-7D8B-4AFE-B0F3-57BC66A0FD79@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM6PR05MB4364; 6:+BO3tVIWvz7rDq4IDi8PMcPRRkEHQ9gFddkX4vOYf4UM3rdmMA5zRgfcfXthpNGoorSkDoXtkBj6C1hgeX6OIgFxc9qKdHSyMi7+TlKbpnfsj6fVMGJB8w6q1lB9dSJ+jX41MA6XDyBhjNxG+oEteNpChzdONlaNMVprvn8rIWNWWhP0LwzR3i9Xwn4Ef9KrzeunFxnDxWCswoW6CKsZvg55FifD3KT1fn/JAY938NR72N60MNcodeSExC9GhgubrKZnm7xEIaeCjxNYjbpHIvraOIqiMGbwuTi6f6XjqAfg4M1N19NAsAOEHC4rG6VmkEnyb3y2VU6KTa3FSy+FbQU9RGH3rcLHY0XYD1+96LgY+aWX5GtqdKTuVNFSptnPDLvQWAv0eEaiR2eKPatenulv39XHJGVcJEgasq/yik82ubT0+XBVcncwhkssIZ5v/jbBH4Qqz93dzqzy8MXreg==; 5:SYo9R7BvldpkL4BUslc8zYMPFACBCsTrDekWjmK8JN4M5BDcmHoaIYiROdwgfzWdEog5y85xeBRMW/M0G/DmMnN8j3IfWxejNco8/lgdZmPY48rj2WU0unTk1iPfgsavM3pX1WVqszeOyYzCPQlqndsK6xm92ZaF5BFSf8jorqQ=; 7:moWvPjEacwS+CmWVwxFK/qRJRIntALXrtLjfaQ3M1vLX8aersUXfxGW1Hecefiq0+BG9LWPrtIYdY/NANFByGd9mRChzGcBDaX2+eXcEkXPBcWIaQZryTfq/PB+8S6MEln+DQOdYy0RLuPND39WU3yLNZqYMVJjjjW+kBcZ/EMsRh44RSYJEIE64BQHBWmjjkGku+mrOtTLYmKp2/bAe74PcCfVr4SckDesGN2E0RaDt3XHws1U9ZJsDNIFGysL5
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: aec6f953-07e1-4b96-a846-08d6085135dd
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989137)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(5600074)(711020)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM6PR05MB4364;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB4364:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB43646DE82F36A1130E6F9789A5300@DM6PR05MB4364.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(20558992708506);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(3231311)(944501410)(52105095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(20161123558120)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:DM6PR05MB4364; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM6PR05MB4364;
x-forefront-prvs: 0772E5DAD5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(366004)(136003)(346002)(189003)(199004)(1730700003)(8676002)(2616005)(81166006)(81156014)(476003)(102836004)(2900100001)(486006)(6486002)(106356001)(36756003)(25786009)(105586002)(2351001)(316002)(7736002)(58126008)(305945005)(186003)(82746002)(26005)(5660300001)(83716003)(66066001)(6116002)(3846002)(6916009)(2906002)(6506007)(97736004)(68736007)(33656002)(8936002)(6346003)(5640700003)(86362001)(99286004)(53936002)(5250100002)(6512007)(2501003)(478600001)(6436002)(256004)(14454004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR05MB4364; H:DM6PR05MB4665.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 8hncg680xMGk27U3bYbjjl7QT0RmeihecQ8+s2bDmruAQZ4rUtRzE+E3al2jMQh+GwJQ/xcCgJZEhM4EkE6figo0S6LSDzlek88sE1Xwp6ac6gBqaZ6qFIccuz+U1+AnUcKshwZaIz3y6MUYf4+tJNNH9HL0NVR93pjpEqmxmpWWiTjCG/kdRjDjI87Po6feY/43JRvCnU1fbOUbrvoDbv/fsVZCQqDrOIGO+rKmL6IXp6+MOu30BZWoqsiZNIxTKJrs1Jy0GAKMETEaehi3hLFH470oVAmF9akSQ7OoXANXTKnlzdHfeAeyGwPD51VcwpiMZQKpJ9pdEqExPxnjb6fwPDfQS/PC4WquwjycwXM=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F1A0B8AF67968342923B77D49782A6A5@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: aec6f953-07e1-4b96-a846-08d6085135dd
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Aug 2018 17:03:40.7502 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB4364
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-08-22_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=630 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808220171
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/N2eTk-pw9w5iuv0al7bHzB1_uK0>
Subject: [Netconf] should onboarding information *set* the debug level?
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:03:45 -0000

Hey folks,

The current (-23) zerotouch text, with all the additional progress report types, says that it's a vendor implementation decision as to whether the device sends, to a trusted bootstrapping server, just the minimal/required progress reports, or the maximal number of progress reports, for better visibility/debugability.

It occurs to me that it would be a better thing to flip this from being a vendor-decision to being an operator-decision, to specify how much debugging the operator wants reported.  This could be added as a flag in the onboarding information itself.

What do people think, worth it?

Kent // author

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email