IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] IETF Last Call Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Mon, 26 September 2016 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C6112B015 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zk6RIDEytbhj for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D39126FDC for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-17v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.113]) by resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id ocWMb1k6K0MKRocXQbbuYY; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:30:08 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([173.48.63.26]) by resomta-ch2-17v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id ocUzbph38bKqdocV4bA1zf; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:28:03 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u8QKRaqo003131; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:27:36 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u8QKRaxE003127; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:27:36 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160925.173348.1439815720507640241.mbj@tail-f.com>
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:27:36 -0400
Message-ID: <87shsm5ruv.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfG4pR+MQVLG4AqAV9AIQDdKmWKqoYjtLXerNmcVtqkko4EXYGzG6NNy2nM4Jbr24HxEQEFpDB2fS7O2cEmXCU/nlJIdlRV0LdSV9ZFIQQMyBHGJumjOA CwL4m7BaUsS9U3h+aOIu7dQ3Y59IoVpslGfz+0x5/Q47tv9Clh5ZKDI+03ADYGJf0eSav7F2+8YvdIl9OYYE/2ws2cQM0r4uVbvoTPKb9IA47Uj+24PoAIZ7
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/N8YlFqIV3kkAUJQR7hGylN7IQSw>
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] IETF Last Call Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:30:10 -0000

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> writes:
>> >     - Does XRD (RFC 6415) admit relative links as values of the href
>> >     attribute of the Link element?  Relative links are not usually
>> >     considered to be "URIs", but rather "URI-references" (RFC 3986 section
>> >     4.1), and RFC 6415 uses "URI" consistently, not "URI-reference".
>> >     Also, all examples in RFC 6415 show complete URIs.  If the href
>> >     attributes have to be full URIs, then the problem with host
>> >     identifiers described above also arises.

> This seems to be a general RFC6415-problem, not specific to RESTCONF.
> Anyway, the OASIS spec for XRD says that the "href" attribute is of
> XSD type "anyURI", which allows relative links.

Yes, it looks like that is correct.  I've filed erratum 4811
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=4811) to get 6415
updated.

Which takes care of that item.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email