[Netconf] WG last call to approve [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5717 (2657)

"Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Fri, 03 December 2010 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BB828C0DF for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 03:45:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.473
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMwLbO-Qo5mw for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 03:45:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postlady.ripe.net (postlady.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:610:240:11::c100:1341]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFDE28C0D8 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 03:45:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dodo.ripe.net ([193.0.23.4]) by postlady.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1POU6R-00081I-8A; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:47:04 +0100
Received: from dog.ripe.net ([193.0.1.217] helo=BWMACBOOK.local) by dodo.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1POU6R-00005G-2n; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:47:03 +0100
Message-ID: <4CF8D8B6.1080106@bwijnen.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:47:02 +0100
From: "Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Signature: 86ab03e524994f79ca2c75a176445dd4fa58af7649e5736021f5708a20478c87
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -2.9 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 86ab03e524994f79ca2c75a176445dd4fa58af7649e5736021f5708a20478c87
Cc: viswanath@huawei.com
Subject: [Netconf] WG last call to approve [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5717 (2657)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:45:54 -0000

This is a WG Last Call to make sure we have consensus
on an errata report to RFC 5717.

Please respond/comment no later than Dec 17 2010 (any time zone).

Based on the errata report, Martin even found another error.
Fixing both, Martin has come up with the following text:


Type: Technical (but it is in non-normative Appendix C)

Section: Appendix C (page 22)

In Step 6, Original Text:

        <select xmlns:usr="http://example.com/users">
          /usr:top/usr:users/user[usr:name="Joe"]"
        </select>

Corrected Text:

        <select xmlns:usr="http://example.com/users">
          /usr:top/usr:users/usr:user[usr:name="Joe"]
        </select>


In step 7, Original Text:

        <locked-node xmlns:usr="http://example.com/users">
            /usr:top/usr:users/user[usr:name="Joe"]"
        </locked-node>

Corrected Text:

        <locked-node xmlns:usr="http://example.com/users">
            /usr:top/usr:users/usr:user[usr:name="Joe"]
        </locked-node>