IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] closure on dynamic model changes

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Wed, 11 July 2018 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099A9130E29 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T1GybZPVSbfd for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9603D130E73 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108156.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w6BLi9QM007224; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:48:11 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=tWA9uOEbk+tIRmYSCtTKNvIpdv1xCL87rxUACXqzNM0=; b=nv6bdfkddjvfJG4sWFYA792HgSYmvhSLTufG5g4twPnPv3lHozVGArln0k+hbcYVBROY FHJDAQUfPTo841uFl2K3B2PLshBHd2lM9HFO9BR4oPnfBoWyUaL6KhDmbTmUaTnbkCjN 5qFHuPdajyojgbjGjth3CVabGHS7HCpuV7AhV9aItHkD23j7LFdWcvNp0L+trio+vu1D zR/i+sPzT9BaC/oqTPun4VwrMyUwcZP+AsmkPshJZCT7m6FCkEPyTmoTIc3v3SsJP0VP L6cZssJOmh0sNPw6p7nNRj2kjLkqmGapvXsz5aa+DyQjkkNQ865nWgJXUocZwHfi9Dhw 8Q==
Received: from nam03-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03lp0053.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.180.53]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2k5p0q8q89-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:48:11 -0700
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.200.153) by BYAPR05MB4151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.199.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.952.12; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:48:10 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc]) by BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc%4]) with mapi id 15.20.0952.017; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:48:10 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "Jeffrey Ladouceur (jladouce)" <jladouce=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] closure on dynamic model changes
Thread-Index: AQHUGWDbLPbtZBdqVkidwW9feognvQ==
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:48:09 +0000
Message-ID: <17CA1DAB-73FF-498D-8EA6-5BD090B9F01E@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BYAPR05MB4151; 7:t8Tnbp+CkGrwFLpFAI1qGYJiVLZTy9ITJ2hb06Ta+yZuBh0venFEgM6aA8QP3I4KGkyeNmHTmvlVdzPd3plWcQzxdYNp86l4yhtXiEoiqq0xH9Sok7PwOLvEzUwRhyotO8j0J/tVDT10tzWpDXxjV8a5IrTErYulY67Q+OJSNxyYtm3Y/2xU889Wyi/ak7zg+GdiU6Mlz7n0HVQmAjkh591stD/+akvslds+NQPuCcdw/K8duY2yl1zbBmKMqaKq
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f2d09543-6e09-44e9-045f-08d5e777fe86
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989117)(5600053)(711020)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(48565401081)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4151;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB4151:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB41517EF09478F2C108957A8EA55A0@BYAPR05MB4151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(158342451672863)(10436049006162)(21748063052155);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(3231311)(944501410)(52105095)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4151; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4151;
x-forefront-prvs: 0730093765
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(396003)(376002)(136003)(366004)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(2616005)(6306002)(106356001)(236005)(478600001)(186003)(6512007)(6486002)(54896002)(316002)(229853002)(81156014)(5660300001)(14454004)(8676002)(7736002)(81166006)(9326002)(2906002)(25786009)(33656002)(476003)(6436002)(58126008)(68736007)(606006)(14444005)(6246003)(86362001)(486006)(256004)(97736004)(36756003)(99286004)(2501003)(53936002)(105586002)(2900100001)(102836004)(6506007)(6116002)(26005)(66066001)(82746002)(8936002)(110136005)(5250100002)(3846002)(83716003)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4151; H:BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: pAFCckZaFAzE7NDLVKi8MA1GF+vKHcKuu4j2mEk3JDP7ODdvp+Z6eTAB9GFKrYb6ElRBUS8AMhftf7AutHJjbXhkOd5owFTQIzCn/0b6DRzfbMbT/4KWzvzQSXM8xmo7Vz8u34Z8t6kvus0hLdllbdikUYN4M7tiN+p34N4KuyETC4LATLKxyLCCVy7MyyFHj11SfbehYyvy9zVdHNcrkV8AE9pbvMbK0clRZn1siTktIEGxm9NwZAzfMmWhu8VvGW90cztSGiSKKuHjgHlS529ajPve6rdwM3pDPs21Qfmef/ckybC8Y6VTWOq+kb6C62UenIm/WsZY/gVDKpudhUAKftCTlhbqQamyuEIUHE8=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_17CA1DAB73FF498D8EA65BD090B9F01Ejunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f2d09543-6e09-44e9-045f-08d5e777fe86
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Jul 2018 21:48:09.8762 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB4151
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-07-11_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807110230
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/O-2ud_VrcfG6BKAx6Lz4TPRsgG0>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] closure on dynamic model changes
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:48:18 -0000

Hi Jeff,

Both RFC 7895 and rfc7895bis (almost RFC 8407) define a checksum a client can poll, as well as a notification a client can receive, to determine when a server's module set has changed.

Kent


On 7/11/18, 5:34 PM, "Netconf on behalf of Jeffrey Ladouceur (jladouce)" <netconf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of jladouce=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:jladouce=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:

Hello netconf experts,

I’m trying to determine if there was closure on the topic of dynamic model changes and the impact on any connected netconf clients.

The last message appears to be 8 years ago:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg05982.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mail-2Darchive_web_netconf_current_msg05982.html&d=DwMGaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=Z5JgjQUnS4iOxPJ2YqJzFJTEW4Pyl-q8NHvml9iW0kc&s=YawnPBrkjAh6mZNBG8fY0VN0Rl8hqYwz_4uxbQc7zCE&e=>

Has there been any standards agreement since the above post or any other discussions ?

Kindest regards,
Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email