[Netconf] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf-06: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 26 September 2018 17:52 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489E3128766; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf@ietf.org, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, netconf-chairs@ietf.org, mjethanandani@gmail.com, netconf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.84.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153798433929.21634.492484619504901988.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:52:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/P5O6I4bc_2I4N1SlzWope_-fa5s>
Subject: [Netconf] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:52:19 -0000
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the well-written document! I only had one comment, namely that Sections 3.1.1.1 and 3.1.2 end with text that certain behavior for non-8342 datastores "SHOULD be defined by the specification for the datastore", and it wasn't entirely clear to me that the 2119 SHOULD was necessary (since it would be attempting to constrain the behavior of future specifications, which is always a bit dicey since they could just update this specification to remove the constraint anyway).
- [Netconf] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Netconf] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund