IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-07

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Sun, 25 January 2015 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715A11A0A6A for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:30:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EfJ6y76c7Aik for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:30:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-x233.google.com (mail-qa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B23A1A000B for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:30:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f12so4341131qad.10 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:30:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=9UUKpTjeWm2TOdl7Kazg4mOE2SeG5aQXeO5/F6/LHUU=; b=jzbB8wH30ejhwv/d7YrWKAH47cOm6ldd1ah/rG6OeRiIOE2y2HiRNpjYDb0Phz/s7z XTO1izUt1SpsanLBrESvZGm9pOk8qfnv8vNem7yk9KmnvKeansU4LDI9WAcHFctGlA/c 7utXIU3GPpoLKcubaKJsQeD1DVvs5ZEkUyHIS3vuvPfIbFZIk8pV12iiwAAciijbFACa cukMhl2etXDiWWk+1L8QiL6OxEg5fTU0mPKjqyushWAPARAEPGkxFtsHNYgjeSlqzlmm g7Od546b44r6Gyem71ArVdUhADKqRqmaHWp9vaIUVoSG98XBrX9aGBxEc7FFVgUNGR+/ 9hGA==
X-Received: by 10.140.108.134 with SMTP id j6mr19463150qgf.68.1422214241403; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:30:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.133] (108-247-127-76.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.247.127.76]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t90sm7804635qgd.47.2015.01.25.11.30.40 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:30:40 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_265CC31C-9DAE-4474-8D7E-365F7A927A57"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8195A73B5@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:30:39 -0800
Message-Id: <B280E3CD-5846-42E4-B0C6-5B603A548263@gmail.com>
References: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8195A73B5@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/SjGnHMsOkXxeSLrpiuxLzIfgGwQ>
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-07
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:30:44 -0000

[Chair hat off]

I support the publication of this draft. The draft has been well written and believe it is ready for LC.

In addition to the two references that Mehmet mentioned, please address/update the reference to draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-cfg to RFC 7407.

[Chair hat on]

Separately, and only because it is mentioned in this document, we need to clean up the description around how the username is extracted from a certificate. This can happen in the netconf-server draft. The three documents talk about a algorithm to extract the username, but the only option that is clear (at least to me) is when the username is ’specified’.

Thanks.

> On Jan 5, 2015, at 12:46 PM, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear NETCONF Members,
>  
> we hereby issue a WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-07.
>  
> The document can be found at:
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-07 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-07>
>  
> Please review and send your comments to the WG mailing list by January 19, 2015 EOB PT.
>  
> The document is planned to publish as a standard track document.
> As a minimum please state that you have read/reviewed and whether you support the publication.
>  
> Please indicate also if you plan to implement or have already implementation experience with the rfc5539bis draft.
>  
> Thank you.
> Mehmet and Mahesh

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email