FW: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-prot-11.txt to Proposed Standa rd [I06-051127-0010]
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Tue, 28 February 2006 09:24 UTC
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FE15X-0002l8-7z for netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:24:11 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FE15U-00048X-PP for netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:24:11 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org>) id 1FE0vh-000CEq-Cl for netconf-data@psg.com; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:14:01 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
Received: from [192.11.222.163] (helo=ihemail2.lucent.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <bwijnen@lucent.com>) id 1FE0vY-000CD9-Hb for netconf@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:13:52 +0000
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1S9Dm5b018172; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:13:49 -0600 (CST)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <DVB4X1BQ>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:13:47 +0100
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550967C047@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: "Rob Enns (E-mail)" <rpe@juniper.net>
Cc: "Netconf (E-mail)" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: FW: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-prot-11.txt to Proposed Standa rd [I06-051127-0010]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:13:45 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1449ead51a2ff026dcb23465f5379250
The comments in the tracker are: Date and Time: 2006-02-28, 1:27:7 Version: 11 Commented by: Michelle Cotton State before Comment: IESG Evaluation State after Comment: IESG Evaluation Comment: IANA Follow-up comment. We understand the registration rules to have changed from First Come First Serve with Specification to IETF Standards Action. IANA has no further questions. But then Sam noted that we have some inconsistencies still. Bert -----Original Message----- From: iana-drafts@icann.org [mailto:iana-drafts@icann.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 07:33 To: iesg@ietf.org Subject: RE: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-prot-11.txt to Proposed Standard [I06-051127-0010] IANA OK. Comments in tracker. IANA Actions - YES Michelle Cotton (on behalf of IANA) -----Original Message----- From: IESG Secretary [mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 11:58 AM To: Internet Engineering Steering Group Subject: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05.txt to Proposed Standard, draft-ietf-netconf-prot-11.txt to Proposed Standard -------- Evaluation for draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05.txt, draft-ietf-netconf-prot-11.txt can be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/cgi-bin/idtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=1075 1&rfc_flag=0 Last Call to expire on: 2005-12-07 Please return the full line with your position. Yes No-Objection Discuss Abstain Brian Carpenter [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Bill Fenner [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Ted Hardie [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Sam Hartman [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Scott Hollenbeck [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Russ Housley [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] David Kessens [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Allison Mankin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Jon Peterson [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Mark Townsley [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Margaret Wasserman [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Bert Wijnen [ X ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Alex Zinin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] "Yes" or "No-Objection" positions from 2/3 of non-recused ADs, with no "Discuss" positions, are needed for approval. DISCUSSES AND COMMENTS: ====================== ^L ---- following is a DRAFT of message to be sent AFTER approval --- From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, netconf mailing list <netconf@ops.ietf.org>, netconf chair <simon@switch.ch>, netconf chair <ietf@andybierman.com> Subject: Protocol Action: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard The IESG has approved the following documents: - 'Using the NETCONF Configuration Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH) ' <draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard - 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol ' <draft-ietf-netconf-prot-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard These documents are products of the Network Configuration Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Bert Wijnen and David Kessens. A URL of this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-netconf-prot-11.txt Technical Summary NETCONF Configuration Protocol The NETCONF configuration protocol defined in this document provides mechanisms to install, manipulate, and delete the configuration of network devices. It uses an Extensible Markup Language (XML) based data encoding for the configuration data as well as the protocol messages. The NETCONF protocol operations are realized on top of a simple Remote Procedure Call (RPC) layer. Using the NETCONF Configuration Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH) This document describes a method for invoking and running the NETCONF configuration protocol within a Secure Shell (SSH) session as an SSH subsystem. Note: The WG could not decide on a single transport mapping for NETCONF, because different types of programmers want to use the protocol. Therefore, NETCONF defines three transport mappings: SSH, BEEP, and SOAP, where SSH is the mandatory-to-implement protocol. Working Group Summary The NETCONF Working Group has consensus to publish these documents as a Proposed Standard. Protocol Quality It is likely that there are several implementations of these documents in various stages of completion at this time. Several major equipment vendors have indicated interest in supporting this document, and some non-commercial implementations are also expected. An interoperability event (just prior to Paris IETF) was held in which 4 implementations participated and feedback was considered in revisions of these documents. Bert Wijnen reviewed these documents for the IESG. Note to RFC Editor (Insert note to RFC Editor here) IESG Note (Insert IESG Note here) IANA Note (Insert IANA Note here) -- to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
- FW: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-prot-11.txt to… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)