[Netconf] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf-04: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 26 September 2018 01:50 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf@ietf.org, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, netconf-chairs@ietf.org, mjethanandani@gmail.com, netconf@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153792661674.5041.18055003441008769454.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 18:50:16 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/WImi6oB1cn28aEEgTOo--m2TwwA>
Subject: [Netconf] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf-04: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The RFC 8040 security considerations are probably adequate for the new datastores.

I noticed the same issue with "identity" that Adam did, though my tentative conclusion
was that these are the more generic "identifier".

[Netconf] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-… Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [Netconf] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund