[netconf] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server-38: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server-38: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

BCP 81 says the registration contact has to be the IESG for things developed by
the IETF.  Why do some of them list IANA as the contact?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

>From Orie Steele, incoming ART Area Director:

Regarding Section 6.3 (Considerations for the "iana-ssh-encryption-algs" Module):

Does IANA accept the python script and the manual revision statement process that is required?