Re: [netconf] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-trust-anchors-23: (with COMMENT)

[Kent Watsen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Francesca,

Thank you for you valuable comments.
Please find below my responses.

Kent


> On Jan 31, 2024, at 8:51 AM, Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netconf-trust-anchors-23: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-trust-anchors/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thank you for the work on this document.
> 
> I have only the same comment as for the companion doc:
> Section 1.5:
>> Various examples in this document use "BASE64VALUE=" as a placeholder value
> for binary data has has been base64 encoded.
> 
> Please add a reference to RFC 4648 (Section 4) when mentioning that this
> document uses base64 encoded value in its examples. (A ref to the base64 spec
> should be added when mentioned.)
> 

This is the same comment in your review of the “crypto-types” draft, to which I responded that I made the update in all nine drafts (including this one).

Cheers!
Kent