IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netconf] Using Netconf in Segment Routing for Database exchange and Path request/reply

"Rakesh Adulkar (radulkar)" <radulkar@cisco.com> Mon, 04 May 2020 04:59 UTC

Return-Path: <radulkar@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701A33A0C14 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 May 2020 21:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=MxTPNYnl; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=0MvH9aaN
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G70u6oUbxgn5 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 May 2020 21:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01863A0C12 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 May 2020 21:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8435; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1588568366; x=1589777966; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=aDmth1VGaQID2x2fQYvwNs0RFSGN8qG0oLTcLOWd3+Q=; b=MxTPNYnl1FUJHAme+nOc5S0s8xQTfpMSKUHaamM3IpV3/KYLcIMOFPIt qGFgzcF0C4uIzc6Zyy0ZGqsAY+D317SGqDELe51lQWimcOgPeIxbpAApJ /L6IIlvd+YGoswe9nukNQ3dBuQgNB0ikp72o+WbquNkZrO0mxEYFEmZrG M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,350,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="756033064"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 04 May 2020 04:59:01 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0444x1jZ030689 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 May 2020 04:59:01 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 3 May 2020 23:59:00 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 4 May 2020 00:59:00 -0400
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 3 May 2020 23:58:59 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=lPWfrw8Q/bX77jo9gags6i+2cjnGC/e00qSGUyzirW5laAfSQ2oX/xnhd76u00MQJPS0A7w8m6ubVWU85cOEcW4BTd7olo606IM2KX9PP850IjPu1Lz/Y2/xdcxMn4+mkq5t/zAorxUBoFUtcD7zHO3TidlsNC6NtG7wN4LMtGjmgbYiPqugoEr0lLek1IGG3QrDT5EPogvYcTVoVdDMaqTrPgAlWPacmy15fbsiEP+SRoG3n7FHX5zEyNNZPZlsnntm90t04Jwk+6GxCxIbjZzNTvBSXwRiq7TIPO8XzdyqIKKShFwfchAj4x6Bw1x80yJvSyT5fiyo8RSXjxCIuA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aDmth1VGaQID2x2fQYvwNs0RFSGN8qG0oLTcLOWd3+Q=; b=NVr2xbdxWZHEOYNYZ5gz2CbNsrGZdSe0+KydUIM14FiZ3EdJt5EAwNUEAFNBG5yH1lro2hOeY6Q3PPfkxd4DtT/hi4g8448w5MWdmpfJhV2H6X1tWhZ2a1qvplppZ143XMQkla07UV608Azez1wk+JCzr51fSfzDcaUMOeueztL1OSvCfbxUNe3PT5WPGkEjwivmFDza3W72lcqhfGQFH6zIcWCh9hirp8zpAaDU2CsVtcjhtrAV1BrVgngmM+U7wD/Z91/Lwuy1Lu4oGkwFNReQ7rdVEog+xZMRFRNPPM7XQEJvH7LMn5T+o4XJqkTvDAcRgnQcdoK0SAD2TEVeiQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aDmth1VGaQID2x2fQYvwNs0RFSGN8qG0oLTcLOWd3+Q=; b=0MvH9aaNCJILsZI7MeGeYVs7YTu6nXLD0B4TP6K20uQB3aFOu3MgALihcDtlrS5hCQgENX/hqDcFD4yobxavPxPxeJr79+3xxfBduZahIw79Dhj1EqybQAhwJvO0N0uizsgzi0j0PtDvSaGQM/DchKts/zvQ8muDIesnITJibeo=
Received: from DM6PR11MB3130.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:67::20) by DM6PR11MB2682.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:c3::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2958.20; Mon, 4 May 2020 04:58:59 +0000
Received: from DM6PR11MB3130.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a952:9799:513a:b06d]) by DM6PR11MB3130.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a952:9799:513a:b06d%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2958.029; Mon, 4 May 2020 04:58:59 +0000
From: "Rakesh Adulkar (radulkar)" <radulkar@cisco.com>
To: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Using Netconf in Segment Routing for Database exchange and Path request/reply
Thread-Index: AQHWIdC4crbtsKnZz06G234GiPt3WA==
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 04:58:58 +0000
Message-ID: <BD96D980-8818-4F29-A1CE-12FD6DD3821C@contoso.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.38.20042808
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [171.76.107.151]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f5612342-724d-4596-a59c-08d7efe7db46
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB2682:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR11MB26829A3F4AEA9736A88BD83FD6A60@DM6PR11MB2682.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 03932714EB
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR11MB3130.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(376002)(2906002)(86362001)(316002)(6512007)(9686003)(478600001)(5660300002)(66476007)(6916009)(66556008)(66946007)(64756008)(76116006)(91956017)(33656002)(6486002)(36756003)(9326002)(26005)(8676002)(186003)(71200400001)(66446008)(6506007)(8936002)(130980200001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BD96D98088184F29A1CE12FD6DD3821Ccontosocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f5612342-724d-4596-a59c-08d7efe7db46
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 May 2020 04:58:59.0499 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: KMjWBNfFPS9EIGisSYTrUGnwV5/M0nbwHgxwK7XRZLfjahUDrgNSmw7qfo+4v8iVlVs+LOAnpF8kc6BZYNPz+Q==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB2682
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.14, xch-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/YJ02Lhevo8p_6psBjI_OXUaH_K4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 04 May 2020 14:02:44 -0700
Subject: [netconf] Using Netconf in Segment Routing for Database exchange and Path request/reply
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 05:02:01 -0000

Hi Team,

Hope you are doing well.

I have below idea, as off now I am not sure if it will work or not.
In current Segment Routing implementation we are using BGP-LS to exchange database and PCEP for path request/reply between PE/P devices and SR controller. I am just thinking that can we use Netconf to exchange database and also path request and reply protocol between PE/P devices and SR controller?
I Understand that the sole purpose of netconf is to manage the network devices with specific use cases to install, manipulate, and delete the configuration of network devices. It’s not meant to carry IGP and TE-related stuff, nor can it react to network topology changes. Each protocol is there for its reasons, and IMHO netconf is not intended to replace BGP-LS and PCEP, and even if it does, there needs to be various development on the netconf side.

So I wanted to know if there is any development in Netconf is going in this direction? If yes, than I would like to share my thoughts on it.

Thanks & Regards,
--
Rakesh Adulkar
Technical Consulting Engineer – Customer Delivery | Cisco TAC

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email