Re: [Netconf] RESTCONF and draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-04 (on the IESG telechat this week)

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Mon, 12 May 2014 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821BA1A07B2 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jlAzdAOIwuEV for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABE21A07B3 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id e16so8754727qcx.27 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=c0Kc54sAmlqL/oiaL/YZ0wBIKd0gRqZNQ3XoFVKqabI=; b=TI2CW4/0ysUNNOLDWWPLi+SoGvQOdNxMJCqq6wkV7/W1y/JgaZ68BI1YFIjhn7e6QP xwWOslzDtv7fmVVp5KDfz8ZSf5pAbPX6WwuxPrDED3nkZfhkwtM1dbYm9u9/KTeNzrKT yd9l+kGDszu0UhywWsdNBos+q4l25AQ+bIiJMFHIeZ4zRnWyWSIFRwLB07pXcbQsjTKU DpaukznreCCDK+DcxHijknUNz9r1nLKuyNCb1Ur2rUnzUPlW9Dsk3DP8BEzsMeOY43HI RZIZPYC25vLqxP78Gqiydj+E6biQy93X+v0GPwGAxTphD9pT5vvFEq1y/jVMrw+hvqud jwcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmv8mlsWjzIfDC0BbvaGeGHXL+xwbQGuNqppVe1PSB2lbYE7FcGqAxbkXMOrEUY/Kz40KnD
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.36.105 with SMTP id o96mr40483903qgo.25.1399935963629; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.104.49 with HTTP; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53714FEC.2030709@cisco.com>
References: <53714FEC.2030709@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 16:06:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHQ4LoM_xcRH-j=3gYo_eBcOjnLmifed1HNa7mt5_k8xAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c17334d22eb404f93bfdec"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/Ybc6khH7-sOisxQOWgZ4f8Twdss
Cc: NETCONF <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] RESTCONF and draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-04 (on the IESG telechat this week)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 23:06:11 -0000

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Please review the http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-
> off-my-lawn-04 BCP in light of RESTCONF and let me know.
>
>

I think RESTCONF violates sec 2.3 wrt/ structure within the URI path.
This is by design.  The document complains about ad-hoc mechanisms,
and RESTCONF is in complete agreement with that.  The RESTCONF
mapping of data nodes to resource identifiers is the opposite of ad-hoc.
It allows multi-vendor naming without collisions and dramatically
improved application efficiency.  (It is arguable that configuration
management
of complex routers would be impossible with a robust schema language
like YANG).


Regards, Benoit
>
>
Andy