IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] nmda-restconf operations (was: netconf-binary-encoding comments)

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Mon, 09 July 2018 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92713131056; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFOCI2pztvqj; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 10:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92B0813106C; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 10:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108160.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w69HmxBR021950; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 10:48:59 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=xblf35PC9SB0/jXeuEAfsecAt18quy40N3BrWAUP/Qo=; b=xyx8uW7i4Ga4s3d6+57+Sb2Ry4zeUVvpMeWjpG7825y3wwe3LHCTZpbofMkyh7IVfn+h p7cmAJxMnlQkfvUiQNqCddTFGTiUFrDxDW5IgruZ5vYCzw24VrsJP9Vuln8taXpSghnZ zDZ44aMjcV0uK6S/bYsNghj9fR+u1VgRoKKNa1IoiDYIB5Ly6tOhCeJz0ezWvQlg/S87 nyib6Y7MIrofYor/yiEktcId8MbQ44zSfd/gN5yujnmSKahZBvrqFX+NDJwBPNna/5tc 0AvsP7UUqvQhuRnh4P/k+2VDANQgd8hvmN5SW1oHeeEzWoqA1h/P13HxuQiimTtvmJEV AQ==
Received: from nam02-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02lp0083.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.83]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2k4b0w07pm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 09 Jul 2018 10:48:59 -0700
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.200.153) by BYAPR05MB4790.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.235.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.952.9; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 17:48:57 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc]) by BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc%4]) with mapi id 15.20.0952.013; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 17:48:57 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
CC: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf@ietf.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, Robert Wilton <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: nmda-restconf operations (was: netconf-binary-encoding comments)
Thread-Index: AQHUF6lET7OqF17zmUiYtvJ3MdJ3dqSHJcuA///CCwA=
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 17:48:57 +0000
Message-ID: <13FABA4A-C367-4E27-88FF-3EA48638249F@juniper.net>
References: <82A8420F-445C-42BD-9A47-DCF62A9864BC@juniper.net> <20180709173041.xkihqyccjcucjslj@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
In-Reply-To: <20180709173041.xkihqyccjcucjslj@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BYAPR05MB4790; 7:gCs8eU89DQ/4aBQIBHSf1cXCNao7/ScUFgM23Us22GPFQkUvocvQlpDjgomxMyzE09OQv5LLYfeJed91CigmFKI49TtG02UK8by8z9ffqRDsv8rfMG1n35xL7lepmL5Xd+g0UlmA/JqvebCCsC7jQAUNynPLh6YzhsSMpvSEo/Ay3T1Ajc/0blOqu7AfZ9ow8xnkopr+XQPX1wwO29gJFz2NygzPcEXFL/GQ1t9B9xiFF92K8rAiMGIx3+ITsLQK
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9dd991af-0ccf-499b-88f3-08d5e5c43ec4
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989117)(5600053)(711020)(48565401081)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4790;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB4790:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB47906C7C59D3CA7B48908BD1A5440@BYAPR05MB4790.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(3231311)(944501410)(52105095)(10201501046)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123564045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4790; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4790;
x-forefront-prvs: 07283408BE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(346002)(189003)(199004)(229853002)(446003)(26005)(102836004)(68736007)(6512007)(76176011)(33656002)(53936002)(6506007)(6486002)(86362001)(6436002)(486006)(2616005)(11346002)(186003)(476003)(106356001)(14454004)(83716003)(105586002)(478600001)(3846002)(66066001)(256004)(14444005)(58126008)(8676002)(305945005)(316002)(7736002)(2900100001)(25786009)(4326008)(54906003)(99286004)(5250100002)(97736004)(82746002)(8936002)(81166006)(81156014)(5660300001)(6916009)(6246003)(36756003)(2906002)(6116002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4790; H:BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: AGHl+hMUy0HK9VI0VXFQe9ZQh/vgYzz4mY/UCkG618IcrPzoyKccK4pE1WuCyiFr3ug04RbqHvWYJnMmercfz2QieZB/tmd74hTC59MSzLzGnmliVFGdw07NFk2ZDU5k2QwtSP6SxOSk4+iEWCPxbZDn94pcIL6RPOJobJNIbF52t05lrL8wcyQ7u7R53KNNSvik0G9XsyH35OxZPBP9WJtI+mvsVXhDGex8dCNpHW7m1y4xhWuVUtQullyb5yZTQ9aCF92eCvvwmyzJXRLaeBUGO2zdyIEkK7XCiVmvMMfeJIkmGBW9f/YlB8OJBS9wKQTZCSnwcg4AdIl0rNlPjHGI6RRjmjzb/573k8461MU=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C0D3A6A51CDB7749BA00A75BA4A2723D@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9dd991af-0ccf-499b-88f3-08d5e5c43ec4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jul 2018 17:48:57.1060 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB4790
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-07-09_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=827 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807090202
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/_yC1MOo7XjtmN88vpmDXq0HKBGw>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] nmda-restconf operations (was: netconf-binary-encoding comments)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 17:49:10 -0000


>> This isn't what I meant.  To be more specific, I'm wondering if the nmda-restconf
>> draft would benefit from having a sentence like:
>> 
>>    A RESTCONF server supporting NMDA datastores MAY implement the
>>    "ietf-netconf" [RFC6241] and "ietf-netconf-nmda" [I-D. ietf-netconf-nmda-
>>    netconf] modules to enable the NETCONF operations defined in those
>>    drafts to appear {+restconf}/operations resource.
>> 
>> Note: I put "MAY" as RESTCONF may someday have a more native way to do this.
>>
>
> Well, "ietf-netconf" does not really support NMDA well and this is why
> we have "ietf-netconf-nmda". Does not make much sense to point to
> "ietf-netconf" in an NMDA document.

But we'd still need lock, unlock, commit, commit-confirmed, etc., right?

Maybe it's a moot point, since ietf-netconf-nmda requires that ietf-netconf
is implemented too, but I thought being explicit would be helpful here. 

So, adding something like this to nmda-restconf would be good?


Kent // contributor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email