IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Action by August 1st: WG call for consensus to have ONE netconf-callhome document

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Fri, 19 September 2014 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8111A0721 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TdFsW7n3jXOq for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0790.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::790]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E6331A06A4 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.140) by CO1PR05MB460.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1034.13; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:14:56 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.179]) by CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.80]) with mapi id 15.00.1029.000; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:14:56 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "t. petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Action by August 1st: WG call for consensus to have ONE netconf-callhome document
Thread-Index: AQHPp3O9vZj6SBd2MEehKjcLoumaLJwI2pkZgABN9ID//9JAgA==
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:14:56 +0000
Message-ID: <D041FF7F.8235D%kwatsen@juniper.net>
References: <53D01A8A.6030703@ripe.net> <53D15B74.7000404@ripe.net> <01b701cfd414$748bff00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20140919185841.GB11277@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20140919185841.GB11277@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.4.140807
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB460;
x-forefront-prvs: 0339F89554
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(51704005)(13464003)(479174003)(189002)(24454002)(199003)(377454003)(50986999)(90102001)(76176999)(83506001)(4396001)(79102003)(64706001)(80022003)(19580395003)(19580405001)(561944003)(99286002)(85852003)(15975445006)(20776003)(95666004)(93886004)(31966008)(83072002)(85306004)(46102003)(2656002)(76482002)(83322001)(92566001)(107046002)(106116001)(77982003)(21056001)(92726001)(106356001)(81342003)(97736003)(36756003)(77096002)(74662003)(99396002)(74502003)(86362001)(101416001)(54356999)(81542003)(105586002)(66066001)(87936001)(15202345003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB460; H:CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <4B002697D1E72E48ADEE488BFB9AB64C@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/aEeBuCo3r0MI2iMokRBPWZ6M4fY
Cc: Bert Wijnen <bwijnen@ripe.net>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Action by August 1st: WG call for consensus to have ONE netconf-callhome document
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:15:23 -0000

But to Tom's point, the reverse-ssh is still listed as an "Active" draft
and the charter has not yet been updated.

Kent


On 9/19/14, 2:58 PM, "Juergen Schoenwaelder"
<j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:

>Tom,
>
>there is
>
>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-00
>
>and there is an update of 5539bis pending that removes call home
>from it. And then there is the NC server configuration model
>
>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-02
>
>I think we are doing exactly what was discussed in Toronto.
>
>/js
>
>On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 03:16:25PM +0100, t. petch wrote:
>> Bert
>> 
>> I never saw a follow up to this - I say more in my e-mail to Mehmet.
>> 
>> Tom Petch
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bert Wijnen" <bwijnen@ripe.net>
>> To: "Netconf" <netconf@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 8:16 PM
>> Subject: [Netconf] Action by August 1st: WG call for consensus to have
>> ONE netconf-callhome document
>> 
>> 
>> WG participants, during our IET90 session, Kent presented
>> and we discussed reverse ssh this issue:
>> 
>>     Asymmetric document structure
>>     5539bis vs RFC6242 + reverse-ssh  -> 6242bis instead?
>> 
>>     Placement for generic content, Including:
>>       Section 3: "Benefits to Device Management²
>>       Section 5: "SSH Server Identification and Verification²
>> 
>>     Best if moved to a common ³Call Home² draft
>>     A ³6242bis² wouldn¹t work after allŠ
>> 
>>     Proposal:
>>     Have a single ³NETCONF Call Home² (draft-ietf-netconf-call-home)
>>     draft that is equally valid for all NETCONF transports
>>     rename this draft and move 5539bis content into it
>> 
>> 
>> We did a hum in the room and there was overwhelming support to accept
>> the proposal. No-one hummed against or abstained.
>> 
>> So we're confirming this consensus on the WG mailing list.
>> 
>> Please speak up by Friday August 1st if you disagree.
>> 
>> Bert and Mehmet
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Netconf mailing list
>> Netconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Netconf mailing list
>> Netconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
>-- 
>Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
>Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
>Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Netconf mailing list
>Netconf@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email