Re: [Netconf] Fwd: Regarding complete device configuration sync to NMS

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Thu, 03 September 2015 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4E31B4739 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 09:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4kGiqHxdywOO for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 09:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0134.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA4571B475E for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 09:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CO1PR05MB460.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.152) by CO1PR05MB314.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.69.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.256.15; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:04:33 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.140) by CO1PR05MB460.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.256.15; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:04:32 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.27]) by CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0256.013; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:04:32 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Shiva Kumar Pathori <pathori@gmail.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Fwd: Regarding complete device configuration sync to NMS
Thread-Index: AQHQ5haPBA3flY3sPUqQ0opSYRGkmp4qtTAA
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:04:31 +0000
Message-ID: <D20DE7BB.D5451%kwatsen@juniper.net>
References: <CAJtYN8+NL_fwNavB-1k-21mBZaS+uebAzwSZLq_ZpGpPP17JQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJtYN8+-wv_eAQOi_oT5Cp-z_8bpuwq+6bQPXWPX4yLYeM3SfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJtYN8+-wv_eAQOi_oT5Cp-z_8bpuwq+6bQPXWPX4yLYeM3SfA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.4.140807
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.13]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO1PR05MB460; 5:txgj0WQS9i6KtAfKk4LrADQm2bVdy51ZuvL/ThybMUaoh47lD+sEeMV1d0EY5HijmPkhdwSC20oF+xXR93GCizxrepscPypodmWWZsmD/0bFH/RBsnOqhgPJSwbDrTa71EVDM3IRqZbrAm3aA6yuPQ==; 24:b2Bk0nlyjFNf38QuLQ23eMoRtDpvdmwfibsAiAfacrONqGACED0oodtxdx//TeEIiwACvlYYCHErltptsEyv7xpsz/bpMi0JUnMVJJ4KUdM=; 20:Dvmbue3VX+RjaR5QhBLMqu2dmcusrJvK6NziznAUro0PUiQg4qXNGX7fFnQ4bicIXtH8j9KWPB1d7ARNR8lPFw==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB460;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO1PR05MB4604C7C5B89FF78E88A4DF7A5680@CO1PR05MB460.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:CO1PR05MB460; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO1PR05MB460;
x-forefront-prvs: 0688BF9B46
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(6009001)(2473001)(189002)(199003)(66066001)(64706001)(83506001)(46102003)(5002640100001)(558084003)(81156007)(5001860100001)(101416001)(189998001)(5001770100001)(76176999)(4001350100001)(54356999)(5001830100001)(2950100001)(50986999)(107886002)(2900100001)(92566002)(5001960100002)(16236675004)(4001540100001)(99286002)(68736005)(36756003)(2501003)(122556002)(87936001)(62966003)(86362001)(5007970100001)(77156002)(102836002)(5004730100002)(40100003)(97736004)(105586002)(10400500002)(106356001)(106116001)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB460; H:CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D20DE7BBD5451kwatsenjunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Sep 2015 16:04:31.2756 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR05MB460
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; CO1PR05MB314; 2:/IQnEKy3AvhIyPFV8IIqNyiJ/m9OC57/OE1tHJLlhrExTq6wnbNQT4mX+ZUfoTiHkczVBE/QDYrh8pdN2cOfDpL6NhAdjpiPduG6bzEAQv6YIZsdm5meSXun8qiFrbMM2BB10iYT9TTDI+cCYzxH7wRKGEyn5QgXqzd+Oqj1Uf4=; 23:HEc8+dkeRBjzfOUXgO0kt3tlz8+ctgGwDUmm8KiF+L1AcQihrlzLHNjmWerker0ol4GxjQvvoJyOGmxiwKDXM7pcYbuddiRjMDy9dPIE+nHVvn3ORitXOS50FgKsSiGQNzpP3GqekTC6c308UJF1FsM6BG1yj1uhPyFCTp0iQ+AblA0XLqE1+ygBhBMzFn3A
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/aKlxioADnPLN1MAFqMkvY9EBxGA>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Fwd: Regarding complete device configuration sync to NMS
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:04:42 -0000

Hi Shiva,


> I would like to propose one method to get the complete configuration through zip file to NMS. I feel this method will be effective instead of <get> without any filter. Please advice.

Regards,
Shiva