[Netconf] [Errata Verified] RFC6243 (4688)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 16 May 2016 20:33 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE8412D525; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.328
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.328 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FFXEHz82I_jW; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219B212D1D7; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A48F6180004; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: muly_i@rad.com, andy@yumaworks.com, balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160516203313.A48F6180004@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 13:33:13 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/aO2pzViQ8lzFw-g_ESIEJLr7UgU>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org
Subject: [Netconf] [Errata Verified] RFC6243 (4688)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 20:33:23 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6243, "With-defaults Capability for NETCONF". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6243&eid=4688 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Muly Ilan <muly_i@rad.com> Date Reported: 2016-05-08 Verified by: Benoit Claise (IESG) Section: 4.5.2 Original Text ------------- If the operation attribute contains the value 'create', and the data node already exists in the target configuration datastore, then the server MUST return an <rpc-error> response with an 'invalid-value' error-tag. Corrected Text -------------- If the operation attribute contains the value 'create', and the data node already exists in the target configuration datastore, then the server MUST return an <rpc-error> response with an 'data-exists' error-tag. Notes ----- According to RFC6241 section 7.2 the behavior for the 'create' operation is: " If the configuration data exists, an <rpc-error> element is returned with an <error-tag> value of "data-exists". " -------------------------------------- RFC6243 (draft-ietf-netconf-with-defaults-14) -------------------------------------- Title : With-defaults Capability for NETCONF Publication Date : June 2011 Author(s) : A. Bierman, B. Lengyel Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Configuration Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6243 (46… RFC Errata System
- [Netconf] [Errata Verified] RFC6243 (4688) RFC Errata System