[Netconf] Next step for: draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-07

"Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Tue, 10 January 2012 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8076421F851E for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:45:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.583
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JzsB53OSCpFb for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:45:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postlady.ripe.net (postlady.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1341]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E361921F8504 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:45:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dodo.ripe.net ([193.0.23.4]) by postlady.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1Rkb4c-00032M-Qz; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:45:07 +0100
Received: from dog.ripe.net ([193.0.1.217] helo=BWMACBOOK.local) by dodo.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1Rkb4c-0008Cd-4c; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:45:06 +0100
Message-ID: <4F0C32D1.4090200@bwijnen.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:45:05 +0100
From: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@avaya.com>, netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -2.9 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 86ab03e524994f79ca2c75a176445dd49afbb27930db6a6e781bfe8ec79f3959
Subject: [Netconf] Next step for: draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-07
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:45:11 -0000

Dan, with revision 07 of the document, all discusses
have been cleared, and all comments have been either
responded to or addressed in revision 7.

I have give the WG over a week to check if they had
any further comments or objections (because we added
a YANG leaf in revision7 to address DBH discuss).

No objections have been raised, so I believe the
document is ready to be sent to the RFC-Editor.

Thanks,
Bert Wijnen
document shepherd