Re: [Netconf] New version for draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push-01.txt
"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Thu, 09 July 2015 20:59 UTC
Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7B11A0203 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDNSLQOuW9oO for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BCC61A01F2 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5310; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1436475594; x=1437685194; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ad5I4CjCrRQwmryFQf9vUDOcb+WuCVvt4naTe5yh4/Y=; b=S1kXuqUEoK5que5tjPLhZ34CV931AXTiEvL4BO/GFi3nRBCadZuO1w3e +IiEyZjd/nY5GpT0jLYHcm3s/AJyIcW4Sa+eMAdyQUPm8BSC+2ERhV8bM 0b1HLQy/P56Ln8b6CxHaikha703bVaKpkBt54XTMc+pPy5UNycvcDp38A k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DRAwD5355V/4QNJK1bgxJUYAaDGrgHCYFzhXUCHIFFOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEIwEBAQQjEUUMBAIBCBEEAQEDAgYDGgMCAgIwFAEICAEBBA4FCIgmDbkhljYBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXgSGKKoQtAQ0aMQcGgmIvgRQFjCqIAwGEZocagTxFg1OLBogMJoIMHIFTbwGBAwEfAyCBBAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,442,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="8466094"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2015 20:59:53 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t69KxrDh020531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:59:53 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com ([169.254.6.208]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 15:59:53 -0500
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New version for draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push-01.txt
Thread-Index: AdC5FyP9Rm6uBgErR8+WZ2t4USQNKABbyl6Q
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:59:52 +0000
Message-ID: <EF64FF31F4C4384DBCE5D513A791C2B121B0515B@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com>
References: <DBC595ED2346914F9F81D17DD5C32B571DBDB39F@xmb-rcd-x05.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DBC595ED2346914F9F81D17DD5C32B571DBDB39F@xmb-rcd-x05.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.229]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/cYiSoMwPMmZjSOz8sNAbVt_XJkI>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] New version for draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push-01.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:59:56 -0000
Adding to what Alex said, here are a few questions left undefined in the latest draft which are worth exploring either on the NETCONF mailer or in Prague... (1) Should this draft support the ability to suspend / resume a Subscription at the request of the Subscriber? (2) Should the loss of authenticated access to YANG subtree be communicated to the Subscriber? (3) Are there filters which should be provided beyond RFC 5277 Subtree and Property Filters? Thoughts on these, or other suggestions/questions on the draft are appreciated. - Eric (also on behalf of Alex and Alberto) -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Clemm (alex) Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 8:46 PM To: netconf@ietf.org Cc: Eric Voit (evoit); Alberto Gonzalez Prieto (albertgo) Subject: New version for draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push-01.txt Hi, we just wanted to let you know that we posted a new version of the YANG datastore push draft yesterday, which we are planning to present in Prague. Please see https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push-01.txt There are a a few technical updates, as well as quite a few editorial updates. The technical updates include: - A parameter that allows a subscriber to specify which encoding to use for datastore updates - A parameter that allows a subscriber to limit on-change subscriptions to certain types of changes There are a few items that may warrant discussion, most of which can be found in section 3.10, including: - Introduction of additional built-in datastreams limited to operational data (section 3.10.5), which we think would be a good idea to formally include in the next revision - Whether to support subscription persistency (currently the subscription lifecycle is tied to the lifecycle of a Netconf session) - Whether to provide guidance on "chunking" of updates (currently left to the implementation whether to send a single update message with the entire data, or multiple update messages each with a subset of the data) - Whether to track the "owners" of a subscription as part of the subscription data model (again, we believe this is a good idea which we plan to add in the next revision) Regards --- Alex (also on behalf of Eric and Alberto) -----Original Message----- From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 3:57 PM To: Alexander Clemm (alex); Alberto Gonzalez Prieto (albertgo); Alberto Gonzalez Prieto (albertgo); Eric Voit (evoit); Alexander Clemm (alex); Eric Voit (evoit) Subject: New Version Notification for draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push-01.txt A new version of I-D, draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Alexander Clemm and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push Revision: 01 Title: Subscribing to YANG datastore push updates Document date: 2015-07-06 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 32 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push-01 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push-01 Abstract: This document defines a subscription and push mechanism for YANG datastores. This mechanism allows client applications to request updates from a YANG datastore, which are then pushed by the server to the client per a subscription policy, without requiring additional client requests. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat
- [Netconf] New version for draft-clemm-netconf-yan… Alexander Clemm (alex)
- Re: [Netconf] New version for draft-clemm-netconf… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Netconf] New version for draft-clemm-netconf… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Netconf] New version for draft-clemm-netconf… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Netconf] New version for draft-clemm-netconf… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Netconf] New version for draft-clemm-netconf… Ambika Prasad Tripathy (ambtripa)
- Re: [Netconf] New version for draft-clemm-netconf… Alexander Clemm (alex)
- Re: [Netconf] New version for draft-clemm-netconf… Ambika Prasad Tripathy (ambtripa)
- Re: [Netconf] New version for draft-clemm-netconf… Alexander Clemm (alex)