[netconf] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-17: (with COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification. This looks good to me from transport
protocol point of view.

I have following comment and I believe if addressed properly, it will improve
the document quality -

# Section 1 says -

     It is intended that these groupings will be used to help define the
     configuration for simple HTTP-based protocols (not for complete web
     servers or browsers).

  I would like to see some examples of the "simple HTTP-based protocols" - the
  words in parenthesis does not help the distinction. The motivation and usage
  of this protocol should be specified clearly.