[netconf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-14: (with COMMENT)
Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 31 January 2024 06:02 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04989C14F726; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:02:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif@ietf.org, netconf-chairs@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, maqiufang1@huawei.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.4.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <170668097300.18988.3062895312146402301@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:02:53 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/gS9PlgzeHGJgYKGdprnRMaS1KHE>
Subject: [netconf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 06:02:53 -0000
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Lars' DISCUSS position. I also support John Scudder's DISCUSS position, and withdraw my own, which I realize now was incorrect and "Specification Required" was a reasonable choice. Apologies for this oversight. Comments preserved from the previous ballot version: The SHOULD in Section 2 has me wondering why one might choose not to do what it says. Or should this be a MUST? I suspect you need normative references to RFC 7303 ("application/xml") and RFC 8259 ("application/json").
- [netconf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draf… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
- Re: [netconf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on … Mahesh Jethanandani