Re: [netconf] IPR call for list-pagination-03

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Sun, 07 April 2024 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <0100018eb8cbb996-e8802617-865d-456f-9d7d-431c06a5c57c-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EA5C14F685 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 06:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.892
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PKd0Fro2kksJ for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 06:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a48-94.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-94.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29DEFC14F610 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 06:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1712497343; h=From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Feedback-ID; bh=gqNIy/fKA46ILrOQKpOGd6aVKvJyNKsNcNZ2OZwRe3E=; b=ZvKWDUR2rmtm2XZnRuapysK5l9S+pmvKSeq0wN/7BF0Uw2dmneBibnpEypiSZSet mR2mVyUUTBgnq2pfc3V63MRmGmIZAGHZFREFohEuwcPK1YeehFsGT5u/qrdIHpltW6i 4b82UwmNQzdb5z1EORKhQx3lvdoKwB0EEz0hRQ2Y=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_03B54D35-4F0C-4352-882B-5599385FE477"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 13:42:22 +0000
References: <E54F9AF5-87B1-430F-997D-06F5B9EA896A@watsen.net>
To: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <E54F9AF5-87B1-430F-997D-06F5B9EA896A@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <0100018eb8cbb996-e8802617-865d-456f-9d7d-431c06a5c57c-000000@email.amazonses.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.04.07-54.240.48.94
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/hDICNZRk9qF_4_-MHeBYxAmc0Hw>
Subject: Re: [netconf] IPR call for list-pagination-03
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 13:42:28 -0000

[Resending, since the prior response didn’t seem to get posted]

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”

Kent // as co-author


> On Apr 6, 2024, at 6:01 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As a prerequisite for the WGLC on this document:
> 
> 	List Pagination for YANG-driven Protocols
> 	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-list-pagination-03
> 
> 	Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> 	"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”
> 	or
> 	"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> 	"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules”
> 	or
> 	"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
> 
> Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.
> 
> FWIW, currently, no IPR is filed for this draft:  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-netconf-list-pagination
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Kent Watsen (as co-chair)