IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Verifing session consensus on RESTCONF as WG item with the maillist

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Sun, 24 November 2013 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE70F1AE0C8 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:04:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.025
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.025 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C7JvAIfagHAR for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:04:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95A01AE06F for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:04:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6451; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1385319862; x=1386529462; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=zx47nJs42k0gHBvKE6W7Anu7D0q69GmOoxpFycEL9ek=; b=Zd3VDQ71ubaOJfY+p1wwX1VevPNsOY8jipx0FjIDaaEcCNKeJVIuISzA Xl3RwB0M1vlTaNxO1Y+a/Hg5azYGzV7aorCtXsE9++wUdsEAjGXYbg6xe l2K2kHjWwSlnmXRfaYE0lQjJh+DxhFzOGCRqqyhha5/ibqU1BxGhWeSNd U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgQFADxNklKtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABZgkNEOFO8HIEdFnSCJQECBC1HFwEIEQMBAig5FAkIAgQBEogBvDIXjhtIExiEMwOYFJISgWqBPoFxOQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,763,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="287199952"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2013 19:04:21 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAOJ4KQh015403 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 24 Nov 2013 19:04:20 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.192]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 13:04:20 -0600
From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Verifing session consensus on RESTCONF as WG item with the maillist
Thread-Index: AQHO6Uf64yjl83FiwUODLuRQC0w+bw==
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 19:04:20 +0000
Message-ID: <CEB78C0D.69F3%repenno@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F81FE2BA@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.21.87.85]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CEB78C0D69F3repennociscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Verifing session consensus on RESTCONF as WG item with the maillist
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 19:04:31 -0000

I support RESTCONF as a new deliverable.  RESTCONF is an very important part of Opendaylight Northbound Interface.

From: <Ersue>, "Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com<mailto:mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>>
Date: Sunday, November 24, 2013 at 6:16 AM
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org<mailto:netconf@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Netconf] Verifing session consensus on RESTCONF as WG item with the maillist

Dear Netconf WG,

in the Netconf session during IETF #88 we discussed the RESTCONF protocol and whether it should be developed in the Netconf WG. There were around 60 participants in the room.
The authors of the RESTCONF draft do not want to create a protocol which competes with NETCONF and it is seen as beneficial if NETCONF and RESTCONF are developed in parallel and aligned with each other. There are obviously different projects outside of IETF (e.g. OpenDaylight and other MANET oriented projects) which use RESTCONF. The opinion poll showed that there is a huge support of the people in the room (and nobody against) to develop the RESTCONF protocol in the Netconf WG. As a result of the discussion with the AD, the WG chairs got the action to prepare a charter update and adopt RESTCONF as the new WG item.

Though before we do this, the chairs need to verify the consensus in the session with the maillist.

Following text is proposed to use for the charter update:
“  3. Develop a RESTful protocol (RESTCONF) that provides a programmatic interface for accessing data defined in YANG, using the datastores defined in NETCONF. The three parts concerning RESTCONF protocol, the transport binding over HTTP and the YANG patch operation will be prepared modular and in separate drafts. This enables to add a new transport binding at a later stage.”

Please state your opinion on this step forward.
If you have strong objections against please state your substantial and convincing arguments.

This consensus call will close on December 4, 2013 EOB PT.

Mehmet & Bert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email