Re: [netconf] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-16

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Mon, 12 February 2024 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <0100018d9ebe5603-4201597f-dbb2-4c63-ba32-f94da0979463-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE87C151556; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:14:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-u0wyRaQXmU; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:14:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a48-94.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-94.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA84C151553; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:14:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1707765290; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=y7t/c0gPKLcrjgn1wsQ7vZgNjAA5DDa2nLgXtUSdTAE=; b=SetDrdB4kW6aJYfz4oFbR2AA/eOTIxvKBCfEyZCBkANd+zLeGl70vdU6ZWrhRXMr RdYa0Xc37TzWKHViwiqgTcBtHGXlfFcMSrv6G828l5P440Px85ag2c2eYJKG94ylCLx QDePEjvAcP6SNwx1CNNNvNrZSBWK11O6ry/XSQyo=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <0100018d9ebe5603-4201597f-dbb2-4c63-ba32-f94da0979463-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CC84114D-A4BF-4057-894F-7AB1AAB767C5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\))
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 19:14:50 +0000
In-Reply-To: <170753393187.36817.12725850532997691597@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
To: Shivan Sahib <shivankaulsahib@gmail.com>
References: <170753393187.36817.12725850532997691597@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.02.12-54.240.48.94
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/j9mozE78nIjlv_2kGWU6cAXpn34>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-16
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 19:14:52 -0000

Hi Shivan,

Thank you for your review!
Responses below.

Kent


> On Feb 9, 2024, at 9:58 PM, Shivan Sahib via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Shivan Sahib
> Review result: Has Nits
> 
> It looks like the document previously got review from HTTP WG, and generally
> looks well thought out.

Thanks.


> However, I'm not sure why only TCP and TLS are discussed in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-16#section-2.1.2.2.
> Is the intention that network protocols like QUIC can be "augmented" in?

This document doesn’t support QUIC (yet).  
The document’s title is “YANG Groupings for HTTP 1.1/2.0 Clients and HTTP Servers”.


Everybody wants this document to support QUIC.   
Doing this would entail a new document called “quic-client-server”.

Do you know if there are any quic-specific configurations, beyond
the basic UDP local/remote/ address/port config?
	- for either the client or the server?



> I suspected that, but in that case, it should be mentioned the same way Basic
> auth is explicitly mentioned to be only one of the ways auth can happen with a
> MAY for other schemes:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-16#section-2.1.2.1-4.4

I just added the following sentence to that section:

     The "proxy-connect" node defines support for HTTP 1.1 and HTTP 2.0.  Support 
     for other protocols versions, e.g., HTTP/3, MAY be augmented in via future work.


Thanks again!
Kent