Re: [netconf] Adoption-suitability for draft-unyte-netconf-distributed-notif

["[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>]

Hi WG,
 
With regard to the 2 questions for this draft:
 
    1) is the problem important for the NETCONF WG to solve?
 
I think it’s valuable for the WG to solve. As mentioned in the other mail, for core devices with large amount of data to export,  distributed exporting mechanism could relieve the device work load.
Directly export from the line cards can avoid the bottle neck when exporting data from mainboard.
 
2) is the draft a suitable basis for the work?
 
Yes. I’ve read this document and think it’s a good basis for the work.



[e-mail] & [e-mail]
 
From: Kent Watsen
Date: 2020-08-06 06:14
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [netconf] Adoption-suitability for draft-unyte-netconf-distributed-notif
NETCONF WG,

Per the previous email sent moments ago, the chairs would like to solicit input on the following draft: 

   Title: Subscription to Distributed Notifications 
   Link: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-unyte-netconf-distributed-notif
   Abstract:

      This documents describes extensions to the YANG notifications
      subscription to allow metrics being published directly from
      processors on line cards to target receivers, while subscription is
      still maintained at the route processor in a distributed forwarding
      system.


In particular, please discuss adoption-suitability as it regards to the following questions:

    1) is the problem important for the NETCONF WG to solve?
    2) is the draft a suitable basis for the work?


PS: this message is itself not an adoption poll, but rather an attempt to gauge interest/support for a potential future adoption poll.

NETCONF Chairs