[netconf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types-29: (with COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types-29: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Similar to what Paul's DISCUSS says:

Section 3.5:

        That said, expert Security opinion suggests that already it is
        infeasible to break a 128-bit symmetric key using a classical
        computer, and thus the concern for conveying higher-strength
        keys begins to lose its allure.

Can we make a reference to said opinion?  Without that, this looks like
argument from authority (and an anonymous one at that).