Re: [netconf] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-14: (with COMMENT)

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Wed, 31 January 2024 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5247C14F5F4; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:39:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x6AJ-mUCr7Fp; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:39:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C510C14F5E4; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:39:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d780a392fdso1485215ad.3; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:39:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706733582; x=1707338382; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XeNC3z2mU7ZNGOv6mLRIJlqtSZawI8awqWbsOGePaqs=; b=cvD8qKsd/6P7/Lu95rpDSVTi86Ty5Xwqq/KGZlEoMVEWqObpv9l6quMak4d9wqmrzt TkEMwh3EgehC9nDh+55Xzm2fYAK7k/Jkiocr633BZuj041pa977huYRksvHsLit0N35/ bkaTqBxDy1VLbKiiS8IZSV9CoVtijMySMXKDi6Rq0TTOzx7X0Em6rqiETsWOgoGwNiAr eQFkH/tayHu4aaGKRiEw73pA4MmY+M03beYncjomSB72O+WuV6Tjw4GsvNPzZYEA22B8 ZSmxBiOxH9Qf7ydcqExKnpCbOKEcR7Xhhq1z4AOkDmvnZQgYw2492lk8U8d10jp9wF9H gH7w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706733582; x=1707338382; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XeNC3z2mU7ZNGOv6mLRIJlqtSZawI8awqWbsOGePaqs=; b=LkHickoGZPmsrYSZz7PvGsmfBri/lEcJQXtTuje7KuXXV1CBZuThfO8H4NFbfivVWu W//RS12pKpLwzOHhbnwI0axr8YMkBey5MiDgTXMVeAJpN1D6nXWcaOwX9V0w59CxIRYW ip6Hb9psH9nNzXuPJhummDzpzbZqxFlwpxVRuTu3ucrXa1vb1WBR4yRRLpGRsPWovMKv wiK+mthYzFQ25UjB6bh4Y98QypQvd7GCFMByD2Jhc9Wfv0K+q8XGE+X5XZcgu21wqwZS dIgHiJWYzappdaK5huSJZFV9ntOntXj12vkfuYcUzAlrX8jQLajmu0ETHY5dW2fIzKBG xfoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YylzrgxiiSd5HFDnV/1p9fA1m/CRe7hwIT3hi6w07GRiOFhvTNJ lz8Ob8KmNI3tUOxwkOcbfnamduZ20ORqE1lqc6L9i0KvVBXit6zRAy5jIYLHBg8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGLm7QxDlQIWgXIztlMx+xiB0M9G5WKqq/qYNwT4npY4prPeohnN1wCwHErsYiiMDjs7HPgJg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3741:b0:295:b003:1407 with SMTP id ne1-20020a17090b374100b00295b0031407mr94714pjb.22.1706733582004; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:39:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=0; AJvYcCXk94G/Wn8/WlDU+BbH8OBjHUsQlp9B79Q+tlQ+5Kp07SBeIOEqtzr3HrKe0TGf2Di7m6K73FiwheYe+ewuVCNqcjLIDrxwgmAGwD1BT6HU7c98tzjOy6WpKs5jUb6EwWNLceS1Hp6T1npYGX0s9twk6uvUJaIe6uXy1b8HfpFnfX8h8qcaLSJKFUUjej9JWuxshiutIcn65D4=
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([70.234.233.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id sz15-20020a17090b2d4f00b0028e17b2f27esm1986814pjb.13.2024.01.31.12.39.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:39:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <0759C743-43EB-4382-970F-DD77CBB669DE@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B6EEE4F9-2666-4215-A167-FB18ADE53FBC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.15\))
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:39:38 -0800
In-Reply-To: <170669711304.61715.4383969207518582579@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif@ietf.org, netconf-chairs@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, maqiufang1@huawei.com
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
References: <170669711304.61715.4383969207518582579@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/kIGttPAMUwo-G9PlO0I6IyFcrpc>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:39:46 -0000

Hi Francesca,

> On Jan 31, 2024, at 2:31 AM, Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-14: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thank you for the work on this document.
> 
> I strongly agree with John's DISCUSS. As he says, RFC required is probably what
> you want, also given that the "Reference" field specifically ask for "The RFC
> that defined the URN.".

I responded to John to say the next update will revert the change back to “RFC Required”.

> 
> In Section 1: Please update the reference to HTTP/1.1: 7230 has been obsoleted
> by 9110 and 9112 (you already have the ref to 9110, so here it is enough to
> change 7230 to 9112).

Will do in the next update.

> 
> Just a note from someone who is not experienced with YANG, so most likely OK to
> ignore, especially since IANA will most likely know how to deal with this, but
> by quickly scanning for the "YANG Notifications" registry group, I am not
> really sure where to find it. 3553 doesn't really point me to it. But again,
> happy to be educated.
> 

It is a new registry, and that is why you do not see it. IANA will create it once the document is approved.

Thanks

> 
> 


Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com