Re: [netconf] IPR call for draft-rogaglia-netconf-trace-ctx-extension-03

All listed authors and contributors have responded not being aware of any IPR.

Cheers,
Kent

> On Oct 15, 2023, at 10:56 AM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As a prerequisite for the adoption on this document:
> 
> 	NETCONF Extension to support Trace Context propagation
> 	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rogaglia-netconf-trace-ctx-extension-03
> 
> 	Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> 	"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”
> 	or
> 	"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> 	"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules”
> 	or
> 	"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
> 
> Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.
> 
> FWIW, currently, no IPR is filed for this draft:  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-rogaglia-netconf-trace-ctx-extension
> 
> Thanks.
> Kent (as co-chair)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf