Re: [Netconf] AD review for draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-08.txt

The February text for the disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 should be OK.

Dan

________________________________

	From: Bert Wijnen (IETF) [mailto:bertietf@bwijnen.net] 
	Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 5:08 PM
	To: Balazs Lengyel; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Martin Bjorklund
	Cc: netconf mailing list
	Subject: Re: [Netconf] AD review for
draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-08.txt

	Dan, is there any new text that Balazs should include in the
next (hopefully final)
	revision? I mean w.r.t. IPR related text?

	Bert

		----- Original Message ----- 
		From: Balazs Lengyel
<mailto:balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>  
		To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <mailto:dromasca@avaya.com>  ;
Martin Bjorklund <mailto:mbj@tail-f.com>  
		Cc: netconf mailing list <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>  
		Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:24 AM
		Subject: Re: [Netconf] AD review for
draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-08.txt

		Hello Dan, Martin,
		Thanks for the comments.  See below.

		I attached a diff between the current 08 version and the
future 09 version as it stands at the 
		moment.
		Balazs

		Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
		> This document is ready to be sent to IETF Last Call,
and I will send it
		> immediately after sending this message. Please
consider the comments
		> below together with the other IETF Last Call comments.
		> 
		> 1. IPR and Copyright issues
		> 
		> Running idnits results in the following warning: 
		> 
		> == The document seems to lack a disclaimer for
pre-RFC5378 work, but was
		>      first submitted before 10 November 2008.  Should
you add the
		> disclaimer?
		>      (See the Legal Provisions document at
		>      http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more
information.). 
		> 
		>      trust-12-feb-2009 Section 6.c.iii text:
		>      "This document may contain material from IETF
Documents or IETF
		>       Contributions published or made publicly
available before November
		>       10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the
copyright in some of this
		>       material may not have granted the IETF Trust the
right to allow
		>       modifications of such material outside the IETF
Standards Process.
		> 
		>       Without obtaining an adequate license from the
person(s)
		>       controlling the copyright in such materials,
this document may not
		>       be modified outside the IETF Standards Process,
and derivative
		>       works of it may not be created outside the IETF
Standards Process,
		>       except to format it for publication as an RFC or
to translate it
		>       into languages other than English."

		BALAZS: Changed IPR to pre5378Trust200902.

		> 
		> Also, the schema in Appendix A will need to include
the full text of the
		> BSD license for code or a reference to it. This issue
is still debated
		> with the Trust, so no action by now on this. 

		BALAZS: So  I should wait for further information. When
and where can I find this, or will the 
		chairs or you supply it?

		> 
		> 2. last paragraph in Section 1.1 
		> 
		> s/This consist/These consist/

		BALAZS: Is OK if I change the paragraph to:
		Protected area: the set of nodes that are protected from
		modification by the lock.  This set consists of nodes in
the scope of
		the lock and nodes in subtrees under them.

		> 
		> 3. Section 2.1.1
		> 
		> s/However it can be used to lock a candidate
datastore/However it can be
		> used to lock parts of a candidate datastore/

		BALAZS: OK

		> 
		> 4. The title of Section 2.1.1.1 seems to me to be more
appropriately
		> 'Multiple managers handling the writable running
datastore with
		> overlapping sections'

		BALAZS: OK

		> 
		> 5. same section - I am a little nervous about saying
'The lock should be
		> held only a short time (seconds rather then minutes)'.
What if the lock
		> can be help less than seconds or minutes at minimum
because of the size
		> of the records to be operated? Maybe better is to say
'The lock should
		> be held the shortest possible time (e.g. seconds
rather then minutes)'.

		BALAZS: OK

		> 
		> 6. Section 2.1.1.2 - better (e.g. minutes, hours)

		BALAZS: OK

		> 
		> 7. Section 2.1.1.3 - same comment as #5 for 2.1.1.1

		BALAZS: OK

		> 
		> 8. page 6 - section 2.4.1 - 'these notes should be
included in the
		> protected area of the lock' - it seems to me that a
capitalized SHOULD
		> is appropriate here. 

		BALAZS: OK

		> 
		> 9. Capitalization seems necessary also in 2.4.1.2 and
also a change as I
		> do not see in which situations if locking fails the
client should not
		> back-off. I realize this is client behavior, but the
normative language
		> still seems to apply
		> 
		> So: 
		> 
		> OLD: 
		> 
		>    To avoid this situation, clients should lock
		>    everything they need in one operation.  If locking
fails, the client
		>    should back-off, release any previously acquired
locks, and retry the
		>    procedure after waiting some randomized time
interval.
		> 
		> NEW:
		> 
		>    To avoid this situation, clients SHOULD lock
		>    everything they need in one operation.  If locking
fails, the client
		>    MUST back-off, release any previously acquired
locks, and SHOULD
		> retry the
		>    procedure after waiting some randomized time
interval.
		> 

		BALAZS: OK

		> 10. Last paragraph in section 3 - why is NOT
capitalized? 

		BALAZS: Just to emphasize it. I removed the
capitalization.

		> 
		> Dan
		> 
		> 
		> _______________________________________________
		> Netconf mailing list
		> Netconf@ietf.org
		> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
		> 

		-- 
		Balazs Lengyel                       Ericsson Hungary
Ltd.
		System Manager
		ECN: 831 7320                        Fax: +36 1 4377792
		Tel: +36-1-437-7320                  email:
Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com

________________________________

	 draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-08.txt
draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-09.txt 	 	

	NETCONF B. Lengyel	 	NETCONF B. Lengyel	 	
	Internet-Draft Ericsson	 	Internet-Draft Ericsson	 	
	Intended status: Standards Track M. Bjorklund	 	Intended
status: Standards Track M. Bjorklund	 	

	Expires: December 5, 2009 Tail-f Systems	 	Expires:
December 13, 2009 Tail-f Systems	 	
	June 03, 2009	 	June 11, 2009	 	

	Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF	 	Partial Lock RPC for
NETCONF	 	

	draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-08
draft-ietf-netconf-partial-lock-09	 	

	Status of this Memo	 	Status of this Memo	 	

	This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance
with the	 	This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full
conformance with the	 	

	provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.	 	provisions of
BCP 78 and BCP 79. This document may contain material	 	
			from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions
published or made publicly	 	
			available before November 10, 2008. The
person(s) controlling the	 	
			copyright in some of this material may not have
granted the IETF	 	
			Trust the right to allow modifications of such
material outside the	 	
			IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an
adequate license from	 	
			the person(s) controlling the copyright in such
materials, this	 	
			document may not be modified outside the IETF
Standards Process, and	 	
			derivative works of it may not be created
outside the IETF Standards	 	
			Process, except to format it for publication as
an RFC or to	 	
			translate it into languages other than English.

	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet
Engineering	 	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the
Internet Engineering	 	
	Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that	 	
	other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-	 	
	Drafts.	 	Drafts.	 	

	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months	 	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum
of six months	 	
	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at
any	 	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any	 	
	time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference	 	
	material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."	 	

	The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at	 	
	http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.	 	

	The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at

	http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.	 	

	This Internet-Draft will expire on December 5, 2009.
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 13, 2009.	 	

	Copyright Notice	 	Copyright Notice	 	

	Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the	 	
	document authors. All rights reserved.	 	document
authors. All rights reserved.	 	

	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal	 	
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of	 	
	publication of this document
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).	 	publication of this
document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).	 	
	Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your
rights	 	Please review these documents carefully, as they
describe your rights	 	

	skipping to change at page 2, line 10	 	skipping to
change at page 3, line 7	 	
	Abstract	 	Abstract	 	

	The NETCONF protocol defines the lock and unlock RPCs, used to
lock	 	The NETCONF protocol defines the lock and unlock RPCs,
used to lock	 	
	entire configuration datastores. In some situations, a way to
lock	 	entire configuration datastores. In some situations, a
way to lock	 	
	only parts of a configuration datastore is required. This
document	 	only parts of a configuration datastore is
required. This document	 	
	defines a capability-based extension to the NETCONF protocol for
defines a capability-based extension to the NETCONF protocol for

	locking portions of a configuration datastore.	 	locking
portions of a configuration datastore.	 	

	Table of Contents	 	Table of Contents	 	

	1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 3	 	1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 4	 	
	1.1. Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

	2. Partial Locking Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 3	 	2. Partial Locking Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 4	 	
	2.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3	 	2.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 4	 	
	2.1.1. Usage Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1.1. Usage Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5	 	
	2.2. Dependencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6	 	2.2. Dependencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 7	 	
	2.3. Capability Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.3. Capability Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

	2.4. New Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6	 	2.4. New Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 7	 	
	2.4.1. <partial-lock> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.4.1. <partial-lock> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7	 	
	2.4.2. <partial-unlock> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.4.2. <partial-unlock> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

	2.5. Modifications to Existing Operations . . . . . . . . . . .
11	 	2.5. Modifications to Existing Operations . . . . . . .
. . . . 13	 	
	2.6. Interactions with Other Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . .
12	 	2.6. Interactions with Other Capabilities . . . . . . .
. . . . 14	 	
	2.6.1. Candidate Configuration Capability . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.6.1. Candidate Configuration Capability . . . . . . . . . . 14

	2.6.2. Confirmed Commit Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.6.2. Confirmed Commit Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14	 	
	2.6.3. Distinct Startup Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.6.3. Distinct Startup Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14	 	
	3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12	 	3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 14	 	
	4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13	 	4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 15	 	
	5. Appendix A - XML Schema for Partial Locking (normative) . .
15	 	5. Appendix A - XML Schema for Partial Locking
(normative) . . 16	 	
	6. Appendix B - YANG Module for Partial Locking	 	6.
Appendix B - YANG Module for Partial Locking	 	

	(non-normative) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
(non-normative) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

	7. Appendix C - Usage Example - Reserving nodes for future
7. Appendix C - Usage Example - Reserving nodes for future	 	

	editing (non-normative) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
editing (non-normative) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

	8. Appendix D - Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27	 	8. Appendix D - Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 28	 	
	8.1. 07-08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27	 	8.1. 08-09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 28	 	
	8.2. 06-07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27	 	8.2. 07-08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 28	 	
	8.3. 05-06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27	 	8.3. 06-07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 28	 	
	8.4. 04-05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27	 	8.4. 05-06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 28	 	
	8.5. 03-04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27	 	8.5. 04-05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 28	 	
	8.6. 02-03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28	 	8.6. 03-04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 28	 	
	8.7. 01-02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28	 	8.7. 02-03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 29	 	
	8.8. 00-01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28	 	8.8. 01-02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 29	 	
	8.9. -00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28	 	8.9. 00-01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 29	 	
	9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 29	 	8.10. -00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 29	 	
	10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 30	 	9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 30	 	
	10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30	 	10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 31	 	
	10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30	 	10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 31	 	
	Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 31	 	10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 31	 	
			Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 32	 	

	1. Introduction	 	1. Introduction	 	

	The [NETCONF] protocol describes the lock and unlock operations
that	 	The [NETCONF] protocol describes the lock and unlock
operations that	 	
	operate on entire configuration datastores. Often, multiple
operate on entire configuration datastores. Often, multiple	 	
	management sessions need to be able to modify the configuration
of a	 	management sessions need to be able to modify the
configuration of a	 	
	managed device in parallel. In these cases, locking only parts
of a	 	managed device in parallel. In these cases, locking only
parts of a	 	
	configuration datastore is needed. This document defines a
configuration datastore is needed. This document defines a	 	
	capability based extension to the NETCONF protocol to support
partial	 	capability based extension to the NETCONF protocol to
support partial	 	
	locking of NETCONF datastores using a mechanism based on the
existing	 	locking of NETCONF datastores using a mechanism
based on the existing	 	

	skipping to change at page 3, line 36	 	skipping to
change at page 4, line 36	 	
	node in the conceptual XML datastore. It contains an absolute
node in the conceptual XML datastore. It contains an absolute	 	
	path expression in abbreviated syntax, where predicates are used
path expression in abbreviated syntax, where predicates are used

	only to specify values for nodes defined as keys to distinguish
only to specify values for nodes defined as keys to distinguish	 	
	multiple instances.	 	multiple instances.	 	

	o Scope of the lock: initially the set of nodes returned by the
o Scope of the lock: initially the set of nodes returned by the	 	
	XPath expressions in a successful partial-lock operation. The
set	 	XPath expressions in a successful partial-lock
operation. The set	 	
	might be modified if some of the nodes are deleted.
might be modified if some of the nodes are deleted.	 	

	o Protected area: the set of nodes that are protected from
o Protected area: the set of nodes that are protected from	 	

	modification by the lock. This consist of nodes in the scope of
modification by the lock. This set consists of nodes in the scope

	the lock and nodes in subtrees under them.	 	of the
lock and nodes in subtrees under them.	 	

	2. Partial Locking Capability	 	2. Partial Locking
Capability	 	

	2.1. Overview	 	2.1. Overview	 	

	The :partial-lock capability indicates that the device supports
the	 	The :partial-lock capability indicates that the device
supports the	 	
	locking of its configuration with a more limited scope than a
locking of its configuration with a more limited scope than a	 	
	complete configuration datastore. The scope to be locked is
complete configuration datastore. The scope to be locked is	 	
	specified by using restricted or full XPath expressions. Partial
specified by using restricted or full XPath expressions. Partial

	locking only affects configuration data.	 	locking
only affects configuration data.	 	

	skipping to change at page 4, line 27	 	skipping to
change at page 5, line 27	 	
	2.1.1. Usage Scenarios	 	2.1.1. Usage Scenarios	 	

	In the following we describe a few scenarios for partial
locking.	 	In the following we describe a few scenarios for
partial locking.	 	
	Partial locking is primarily useful towards the running
Partial locking is primarily useful towards the running	 	
	configuration. However it can be used to lock a candidate
datastore	 	configuration. However it can be used to lock a
candidate datastore	 	
	as well. While scenarios using the running datastore are seen as
the	 	as well. While scenarios using the running datastore are
seen as the	 	
	most important, as an example a scenario involving the candidate
most important, as an example a scenario involving the candidate

	datastore is also presented. Besides the three described here,
there	 	datastore is also presented. Besides the three described
here, there	 	
	are many other usage scenarios possible.	 	are many
other usage scenarios possible.	 	

	2.1.1.1. Multiple managers handling the writable running
datastore	 	2.1.1.1. Multiple managers handling the writable
running datastore with	 	
			overlapping sections	 	

	Multiple managers are handling the same NETCONF agent
simultaneously.	 	Multiple managers are handling the same NETCONF
agent simultaneously.	 	
	The agent is handled via the writable running datastore. Each
The agent is handled via the writable running datastore. Each	 	
	manager has his or her own task, which might involve the
modification	 	manager has his or her own task, which might
involve the modification	 	
	of overlapping sections of the datastore.	 	of
overlapping sections of the datastore.	 	

	After collecting and analyzing input and preparing the NETCONF
After collecting and analyzing input and preparing the NETCONF	 	
	operations off-line, the manager locks the areas that are
important	 	operations off-line, the manager locks the areas
that are important	 	
	for his task using one single <partial-lock> operation. The
manager	 	for his task using one single <partial-lock> operation.
The manager	 	
	executes a number of <edit-config> operations to modify the
executes a number of <edit-config> operations to modify the	 	
	configuration, then releases the partial-lock. The lock should
be	 	configuration, then releases the partial-lock. The lock
should be	 	

	held for only a short time (seconds rather then minutes). The
held for the shortest possible time (e.g. seconds rather then	 	
	manager should collect all human input before locking anything.
As	 	minutes). The manager should collect all human input
before locking	 	
	each manager locks only a part of the data model, usually
multiple	 	anything. As each manager locks only a part of
the data model,	 	
	operators can execute the <edit-config> operations
simultaneously.	 	usually multiple operators can execute the
<edit-config> operations	 	
			simultaneously.	 	

	2.1.1.2. Multiple managers handling the writable running
datastore,	 	2.1.1.2. Multiple managers handling the writable
running datastore,	 	
	distinct management areas	 	distinct management
areas	 	

	Multiple managers are handling the same NETCONF agent
simultaneously.	 	Multiple managers are handling the same NETCONF
agent simultaneously.	 	
	The agent is handled via the writable running datastore. The
agent's	 	The agent is handled via the writable running datastore.
The agent's	 	
	data model contains a number of well defined separate areas that
can	 	data model contains a number of well defined separate
areas that can	 	
	be configured without impacting other areas. An example can be a
be configured without impacting other areas. An example can be a

	server with multiple applications running on it, or a number of
a	 	server with multiple applications running on it, or a
number of a	 	
	network elements with a common NETCONF agent for management.
network elements with a common NETCONF agent for management.	 	

	Each manager has his or her own task, which does not involve the
Each manager has his or her own task, which does not involve the

	modification of overlapping sections of the datastore.
modification of overlapping sections of the datastore.	 	

	The manager locks his area with a <partial-lock> operation, uses
a	 	The manager locks his area with a <partial-lock>
operation, uses a	 	
	number of <edit-config> commands to modify it, later releases
the	 	number of <edit-config> commands to modify it, later
releases the	 	
	lock. As each manager has his functional area assigned to him,
and	 	lock. As each manager has his functional area assigned
to him, and	 	
	he locks only that area, multiple managers can edit the
configuration	 	he locks only that area, multiple managers can
edit the configuration	 	

	simultaneously. Locks can be held for extended periods (minutes,
simultaneously. Locks can be held for extended periods (e.g.	 	
	hours), as this will not hinder other managers.	 	minutes,
hours), as this will not hinder other managers.	 	

	This scenario assumes, that the global lock operation from
[NETCONF]	 	This scenario assumes, that the global lock
operation from [NETCONF]	 	
	is not used.	 	is not used.	 	

	2.1.1.3. Multiple managers handling the candidate datastore in a
semi-	 	2.1.1.3. Multiple managers handling the candidate
datastore in a semi-	 	
	coordinated work mode	 	coordinated work mode	 	

	Multiple managers are handling the same NETCONF agent
simultaneously.	 	Multiple managers are handling the same NETCONF
agent simultaneously.	 	
	The agent is handled via the candidate datastore. Each manager
has	 	The agent is handled via the candidate datastore. Each
manager has	 	
	his or her own task which might involve the modification of
his or her own task which might involve the modification of	 	
	overlapping sections of the datastore.	 	overlapping
sections of the datastore.	 	

	After collecting and analyzing input and preparing the NETCONF
After collecting and analyzing input and preparing the NETCONF	 	
	operations off-line, the manager locks the areas that are
important	 	operations off-line, the manager locks the areas
that are important	 	
	for his task using one single <partial-lock> operation in both
the	 	for his task using one single <partial-lock> operation
in both the	 	
	candidate and the running datastore. He executes a number of
<edit-	 	candidate and the running datastore. He executes a
number of <edit-	 	
	config> operations to modify the configuration, then releases
the	 	config> operations to modify the configuration, then
releases the	 	

	partial-lock. The lock should be held for only a short time
(seconds	 	partial-lock. The lock should only be held for
the shortest possible	 	
	rather then minutes).	 	time (e.g. seconds rather then
minutes).	 	

	Operators coordinate with each other. When all of them finish
their	 	Operators coordinate with each other. When all of them
finish their	 	
	tasks one of them orders commit. If any of the operators are
still	 	tasks one of them orders commit. If any of the operators
are still	 	
	working, and holds a lock, the commit will fail, and will need
to be	 	working, and holds a lock, the commit will fail, and
will need to be	 	
	repeated after all managers finish.	 	repeated after
all managers finish.	 	

	Warning: When multiple managers use the candidate configuration
in	 	Warning: When multiple managers use the candidate
configuration in	 	
	parallel, there is a risk that the interaction of access control
parallel, there is a risk that the interaction of access control

	(which is still implementation specific at the time of this
writing)	 	(which is still implementation specific at the
time of this writing)	 	
	and the commit operation might result in a dead-lock, as
illustrated	 	and the commit operation might result in a
dead-lock, as illustrated	 	

	skipping to change at page 8, line 15	 	skipping to
change at page 9, line 17	 	
	The <partial-lock> operation is designed for simplicity, so when
a	 	The <partial-lock> operation is designed for simplicity,
so when a	 	
	partial lock is executed you get what you asked for: a set of
nodes	 	partial lock is executed you get what you asked for: a
set of nodes	 	
	that are locked for writing. As a consequence users must observe
the	 	that are locked for writing. As a consequence users must
observe the	 	
	following:	 	following:	 	

	o Locking does not affect read operations.	 	o
Locking does not affect read operations.	 	

	o If part of a datastore is locked, this has no effect on any
o If part of a datastore is locked, this has no effect on any	 	
	unlocked parts of the datastore. If this is a problem (e.g.,
unlocked parts of the datastore. If this is a problem (e.g.,	 	
	changes depend on data values or nodes outside the protected
part	 	changes depend on data values or nodes outside the
protected part	 	

	of the datastore), these nodes should be included in the
protected	 	of the datastore), these nodes SHOULD be
included in the protected	 	
	area of the lock.	 	area of the lock.	 	

	o Configuration data can be edited both inside and outside the
o Configuration data can be edited both inside and outside the	 	
	protected area of a lock. It is the responsibility of the
NETCONF	 	protected area of a lock. It is the responsibility of
the NETCONF	 	
	client application to lock all relevant parts of a datastore
that	 	client application to lock all relevant parts of a
datastore that	 	
	are crucial for a specific management action.	 	are
crucial for a specific management action.	 	

	Note: The <partial-lock> operation does not modify the global
<lock>	 	Note: The <partial-lock> operation does not modify the
global <lock>	 	
	operation defined in the base NETCONF Protocol [NETCONF]. If
part of	 	operation defined in the base NETCONF Protocol
[NETCONF]. If part of	 	
	a datastore is already locked by <partial-lock>, then a global
lock	 	a datastore is already locked by <partial-lock>, then a
global lock	 	

	skipping to change at page 10, line 46	 	skipping to
change at page 12, line 35	 	
	not an Instance Identifier, the <error-tag> is 'invalid-value',
the	 	not an Instance Identifier, the <error-tag> is
'invalid-value', the	 	
	<error-app-tag> is 'invalid-lock-specification'.
<error-app-tag> is 'invalid-lock-specification'.	 	

	If access control denies the partial lock, the <error-tag> is
If access control denies the partial lock, the <error-tag> is	 	
	'access-denied'.	 	'access-denied'.	 	

	2.4.1.2. Deadlock Avoidance	 	2.4.1.2. Deadlock
Avoidance	 	

	As with most locking systems, it is possible that two management
As with most locking systems, it is possible that two management

	sessions trying to lock different parts of the configuration
could	 	sessions trying to lock different parts of the
configuration could	 	

	become dead-locked. To avoid this situation, clients should lock
become dead-locked. To avoid this situation, clients SHOULD lock

	everything they need in one operation. If locking fails, the
client	 	everything they need in one operation. If locking fails,
the client	 	

	should back-off, release any previously acquired locks, and
retry the	 	MUST back-off, release any previously acquired
locks, and SHOULD	 	
	procedure after waiting some randomized time interval.
retry the procedure after waiting some randomized time interval.

	2.4.2. <partial-unlock>	 	2.4.2. <partial-unlock>	 	

	The operation unlocks the parts of the datastores that were
The operation unlocks the parts of the datastores that were	 	
	previously locked using <partial-lock> during the same session.
previously locked using <partial-lock> during the same session.	 	

	Parameters:	 	Parameters:	 	

	lock-id: Identity of the lock to be unlocked. This lock-id MUST
lock-id: Identity of the lock to be unlocked. This lock-id MUST	 	
	have been received as a response to a lock request by the
manager	 	have been received as a response to a lock request by
the manager	 	

	skipping to change at page 13, line 29	 	skipping to
change at page 15, line 19	 	
	users's sessions.	 	users's sessions.	 	

	The NETCONF server may log partial lock requests in an audit
The NETCONF server may log partial lock requests in an audit	 	
	trail.	 	trail.	 	

	A lock that is hung for some reason (e.g., a broken TCP
connection	 	A lock that is hung for some reason (e.g., a
broken TCP connection	 	
	that the server has not yet recognised) can be released using
another	 	that the server has not yet recognised) can be released
using another	 	
	NETCONF session by explicitly killing the session owning that
lock	 	NETCONF session by explicitly killing the session owning
that lock	 	
	using the <kill-session> operation.	 	using the
<kill-session> operation.	 	

	Partial locking is NOT an authorization mechanism; it SHOULD NOT
be	 	Partial locking is not an authorization mechanism; it
SHOULD NOT be	 	
	used to provide security or access control. Partial locking
SHOULD	 	used to provide security or access control. Partial
locking SHOULD	 	
	only be used as a mechanism for providing consistency when
multiple	 	only be used as a mechanism for providing
consistency when multiple	 	
	managers are trying to configure the node. It is vital that
users	 	managers are trying to configure the node. It is vital
that users	 	
	easily understand the exact scope of a lock. This is why the
scope	 	easily understand the exact scope of a lock. This is why
the scope	 	
	is determined when granting a lock and is not modified
thereafter.	 	is determined when granting a lock and is not
modified thereafter.	 	

	4. IANA Considerations	 	4. IANA Considerations	 	

	This document registers two URIs for the NETCONF XML namespace
in the	 	This document registers two URIs for the NETCONF XML
namespace in the	 	
	IETF XML registry [RFC3688]. Note that the capability URN is
IETF XML registry [RFC3688]. Note that the capability URN is	 	

	skipping to change at page 27, line 7	 	skipping to
change at page 28, line 7	 	
	<nc:rpc xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"
<nc:rpc xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:partial-lock:1.0"	 	
	xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"	 	
	message-id="105">	 	message-id="105">	 	
	<partial-unlock>	 	<partial-unlock>	 	
	<lock-id>1</lock-id>	 	<lock-id>1</lock-id>	 	
	</partial-unlock>	 	</partial-unlock>	 	
	</nc:rpc>	 	</nc:rpc>	 	

	8. Appendix D - Change Log	 	8. Appendix D - Change
Log	 	

	8.1. 07-08	 	8.1. 08-09	 	

	Clarifications	 	Clarifications	 	

	8.2. 06-07	 	8.2. 07-08	 	

			Clarifications	 	

			8.3. 06-07	 	

	Changed XSD and YANG to allow additional proprietary datastores
to be	 	Changed XSD and YANG to allow additional proprietary
datastores to be	 	
	locked.	 	locked.	 	

	8.3. 05-06	 	8.4. 05-06	 	

	Added usage example	 	Added usage example	 	

	Clarified error messages	 	Clarified error messages

	Clarified interaction with edit-config continue-on-error
Clarified interaction with edit-config continue-on-error	 	

	Improved YANG: indentation, canonical order, contact info
Improved YANG: indentation, canonical order, contact info	 	

	Added usage example in appendix C	 	Added usage
example in appendix C	 	

	Synchronized YANG and XSD	 	Synchronized YANG and
XSD	 	

	8.4. 04-05	 	8.5. 04-05	 	

	Language and editorial updates	 	Language and editorial
updates	 	

	all app-tags are with dashes without spaces	 	all
app-tags are with dashes without spaces	 	

	Added usage scenarios	 	Added usage scenarios	 	

	Changed encoding	 	Changed encoding	 	

	Clarified definitions, separated scope of lock and protected
area	 	Clarified definitions, separated scope of lock and
protected area	 	

	8.5. 03-04	 	8.6. 03-04	 	

	Minor clarifications	 	Minor clarifications	 	

	Added list of locked-nodes to the output of partial-lock.
Added list of locked-nodes to the output of partial-lock.	 	

	Added <target> wrapper around datastore names.	 	Added
<target> wrapper around datastore names.	 	

	Allowed atomic/one operation locking of datastore parts in
multiple	 	Allowed atomic/one operation locking of
datastore parts in multiple	 	
	datastores.	 	datastores.	 	

	Improved English (hopefully)	 	Improved English
(hopefully)	 	

	Removed the <data> element from rpc-reply following the text of
Removed the <data> element from rpc-reply following the text of	 	
	rfc4741.	 	rfc4741.	 	

	8.6. 02-03	 	8.7. 02-03	 	

	Minor clarifications	 	Minor clarifications	 	

	Same descriptions in XSD and YANG.	 	Same
descriptions in XSD and YANG.	 	

	8.7. 01-02	 	8.8. 01-02	 	

	Made XSD normative	 	Made XSD normative	 	

	Clarified that no specific access control is assumed.
Clarified that no specific access control is assumed.	 	

	Clarified that non-existing nodes are NOT covered by the lock,
even	 	Clarified that non-existing nodes are NOT covered by the
lock, even	 	
	if they where existing and covered by the lock when it was
originally	 	if they where existing and covered by the lock
when it was originally	 	
	granted.	 	granted.	 	

	Some rewording	 	Some rewording	 	

	Added app-tags for two of the error cases.	 	Added
app-tags for two of the error cases.	 	

	Made YANG an informative reference	 	Made YANG an
informative reference	 	

	Enhanced security considerations.	 	Enhanced
security considerations.	 	

	8.8. 00-01	 	8.9. 00-01	 	

	Added YANG module.	 	Added YANG module.	 	

	8.9. -00	 	8.10. -00	 	

	Created from draft-lengyel-ngo-partial-lock-01.txt
Created from draft-lengyel-ngo-partial-lock-01.txt	 	

	9. Acknowledgements	 	9. Acknowledgements	 	

	Thanks to Andy Bierman, Sharon Chisholm, Phil Shafer , David
Thanks to Andy Bierman, Sharon Chisholm, Phil Shafer , David	 	
	Harrington, Mehmet Ersue, Wes Hardaker, Juergen Schoenwaelder,
Washam	 	Harrington, Mehmet Ersue, Wes Hardaker, Juergen
Schoenwaelder, Washam	 	
	Fan and many other members of the NETCONF WG for providing
important	 	Fan and many other members of the NETCONF WG for
providing important	 	
	input to this document.	 	input to this document.	 	

 End of changes. 25 change blocks. 	
	65 lines changed or deleted	 	82 lines changed or
added	 	

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.35. The latest version is
available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ 	

________________________________

		_______________________________________________
		Netconf mailing list
		Netconf@ietf.org
		https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

________________________________

		Internal Virus Database is out of date.
		Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
		Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.58/2164 -
Release Date: 06/08/09 17:59:00